Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 28 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upComments
whedon
assigned
danielskatz
Dec 6, 2018
whedon
added
the
review
label
Dec 6, 2018
whedon
referenced this issue
Dec 6, 2018
Closed
[PRE REVIEW]: Cadabra2: computer algebra for field theory revisited #1117
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. @StewMH, it looks like you're currently assigned as the reviewer for this paper If you haven't already, you should seriously consider unsubscribing from GitHub notifications for this (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews) repository. As a reviewer, you're probably currently watching this repository which means for GitHub's default behaviour you will receive notifications (emails) for all reviews To fix this do the following two things:
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Hi @StewMH and @henrik227 - thanks again for agreeing. Please read the first comment in this issue, then proceed to perform your review, checking off the boxes in that issue under your name as you do so. If you have any questions, please let me know. |
whedon commentedDec 6, 2018
Submitting author: @kpeeters (Kasper Peeters)
Repository: https://github.com/kpeeters/cadabra2
Version: 2.2.2
Editor: @danielskatz
Reviewer: @StewMH, @henrik227
Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@StewMH & @henrik227, please carry out your review in this issue by updating the checklist below. If you cannot edit the checklist please:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.theoj.org/about#reviewer_guidelines. Any questions/concerns please let @danielskatz know.
Review checklist for @StewMH
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
paper.md
file include a list of authors with their affiliations?Review checklist for @henrik227
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
paper.md
file include a list of authors with their affiliations?