/joss

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updating docs to include JOSE #491

Open
tracykteal opened this Issue Feb 4, 2019 · 5 comments

Comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
5 participants
@tracykteal @arfon @danielskatz @labarba @jedbrown
@tracykteal
Copy link
Contributor

tracykteal commented Feb 4, 2019 •
edited

The Readthedocs is a great resource. It would be nice to add JOSE docs too. I can see a few ways to do this

  1. Update this documentation mainly around Reviewers, changing 'Review guidelines' to 'JOSS Reviewer guidelines' and then adding a 'JOSE Reviewer guidelines'. Likely also adding another template Editorial invite letter too.

  2. A different re-organization, basically with a JOSS section and a JOSE section. This could scale more easily to include other Open Journals. But then there might be a repeat in materials.

  3. Totally different docs for JOSS and JOSE. This would be clean, but then again would likely have some repeated materials.

Thoughts or other ideas? @labarba @arfon @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
@arfon

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Member

arfon commented Feb 4, 2019

I think I would favour duplicate docs for JOSE (at https://jose.readthedocs.io)
@danielskatz

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Collaborator

danielskatz commented Feb 4, 2019

I agree with @arfon
@labarba

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Member

labarba commented Feb 4, 2019 •
edited

@jedbrown

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Member

jedbrown commented Feb 4, 2019

I think both JOSS and JOSE should configure custom domains; docs.joss.theoj.org or joss.docs.theoj.org would be fine.

https://docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/custom_domains.html
@arfon

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Member

arfon commented Feb 5, 2019

I think both JOSS and JOSE should configure custom domains; docs.joss.theoj.org or joss.docs.theoj.org would be fine.

Yep, we could do that.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment