Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

What happens now?

This submission is currently in a pre-review state which means we are waiting for an editor to be assigned and for them to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience 😸

You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

👉 Check article proof 📄 👈

Message from the submitting author:

Our paper details our recent R package, which detects fraud in online surveys by tracing, scoring, and visualizing IP addresses, after cleaning IP data. In our previous submission, @arfon (rightly) noted the package was in the "minor utility" category. As a response, we have worked to significantly expand the package functionality as well as including a variety of cleaning and plotting tools, all with the goal of making survey research more efficient and reproducible. Our package is very important for practical research that uses online surveys, from marketing to political science, and many other fields. Thank you for considering.

Hi - many thanks for considering our paper! We recommend either @RMHogervorst or @alexhanna as reviewers, though we are certainly open to your thoughts on it as well. Many thanks again and let us know whatever else you need in the process.

👋 @jasonclark, @cMadan, @arokem - would one of you be willing to edit this submission?

@danielskatz I don't use R, sorry!

👋 @jasonclark, @arokem - would one of you be willing to edit this submission?

👋 @jasonclark, @arokem - ping... would one of you be willing to edit this submission?

Hi @danielskatz - I have some suggested reviewers if these don't work out. Let me know if you would like to invite someone else to take a look. Happy to help how I can.

Please suggest reviewers here - and I'll keep trying to get an editor lined up. Having suggestions will help the editor.

Awesome - this is copied and pasted from my note above: We recommend either @RMHogervorst or @alexhanna as reviewers, though we are certainly open to your thoughts on it as well. Many thanks again and let us know whatever else you need in the process.

@yochannah would you be able to edit this?