Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 28 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upCitation files #64
Comments
danielskatz
added
the
A&P doc discussion
label
Oct 4, 2018
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
I agree with @katrinleinweber that 'translation tools' are out-of-scope. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
The writing group thinks we need to mention this topic, though maybe we don't need go into too much detail. Perhaps add a table that says what these are, what the uses are (and links to them). @cm-j0nes to suggest changes in Section 3.3 and maybe Section 1 |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
closing this in favor of progress in the document itself. |
danielskatz
closed this
Feb 7, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
danielskatz commentedOct 4, 2018
•
edited
Based on discussion in Section 1 (and Section 3.3) of A&P google doc
We have multiple types of citation files now: codemeta.json, citation.cff, CITATION files as proposed/used by CRAN.