/force11-sciwg

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Institution items #79

Closed
danielskatz opened this Issue Oct 4, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
A&P doc discussion
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
2 participants
@danielskatz @dbouquin
@danielskatz
Copy link
Collaborator

danielskatz commented Oct 4, 2018

Based on discussion in Section 4.6 of A&P google doc

  • Need to address issues in this section.

@danielskatz danielskatz added the A&P doc discussion label Oct 4, 2018

@dbouquin

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Contributor

dbouquin commented Oct 23, 2018

Institutions also manage internal repositories - we can recommend that they incorporate software citation principles and metadata standards into their repository workflows and metadata schemas. We can also recommend promoting any guidelines the WG develops/training materials. Should we specifically focus at all on curators too? We talk about publishers but not repository curators who may want to make changes to their own repositories to better accommodate software citation/preservation.
@danielskatz

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Collaborator

danielskatz commented Feb 7, 2019

I've added a note in 4.6 to indicate this possible repository role, pointing to the repository section: 4.3

@danielskatz danielskatz closed this Feb 7, 2019

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment