I don't think this is in scope, and vote to remove it from the doc

Transitive credit through dependencies is much more complex than described in the document and could be the subject of a task-force, especially to check feasibility with the existing systems in place.
In my opinion this a very difficult goal.

+1 for out-of-scope (#80)

will mark as out of scope - @danielskatz to add to "out of scope" discussion. @dbouquin to mention credit somewhere else, and say that it's important, but out of scope for the time being.

done by @danielskatz - when @dbouquin is satisfied she's done the other part, she should close this issue.

@dbouquin - just let me know when this should be closed and I will close it

@danielskatz this looks good to me.