Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 28 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign up"archived" language #85
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
ASCL describes itself as a registry, which I think is different than an archive. My initial definitions (which certainly could use work) are:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
In discussion today it seemed like there may be value in adding a sentence about what we're referring to as an "index" |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Thinking about this a bit more, a set of concepts seems to me to be:
Feel free to improve these definitions, or suggest different terms |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
owlice
commented
Feb 7, 2019
•
ASCL started out solely as a repository, requiring code deposit, and still acts as one for authors who want us to serve an archive file of their code. We dropped the requirement for code deposit in 2010, so started using "registry" a couple of years later to let people know we don't require code deposit. We do still accept (and for software in danger of being lost, beg for) code deposit, assign DOIs for codes we house, and serve those codes to the public. Dan, re your list, I would use "maintained" for software that is actively maintained by developers, and rather than "stewarded", would use "curated" for code that is actively preserved. Also, "published" often means available online. You've defined "published" and "archived" as essentially the same thing. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
I think the first footnote does a good job clarifying the reasoning behind "published" and would suggest sticking with "stewarded" (though we don't really use that language in the document). We only say "...that repository steward the software with long-term preservation as their goal..." One can curate a collection without archiving it. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@owlice - thanks for your thoughts. I think we've moved from using these issues back to mostly having discussion in the document, though, and this issue is a bit out of date compared to the document. Can you take a look at the current version and see if you have comments to make there? And I'm going to close a bunch of these issues now, as having discussion in 2 places is probably counterproductive as we get close to completing the document. |
dbouquin commentedOct 23, 2018
It would be valuable to define what we mean by "archived" as well as "published" vs. "unpublished". When we say "archived" do we just mean that the repository is purposefully working to preserve the software? Or that it implements archival standards that do not contradict the software citation principles? E.g. ASCL vs. Zenodo