Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 31 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upDuplicated records #53
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Yes to a DEPRECATED tag ... I think this will help us keep the record IDs live but communicate beyond COMMENT that there is an issue.... if we hide this in COMMENT tags information will get lost as several records have several COMMENTs We should do a global check for duplicates, I found some UF cases that are likely duplicates too: I am going to comment some validation suggestions on the Validator issue shortly ... |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Treutler commentedMar 25, 2019
I just stumbled over two records, which seem to be duplicates. Meta data as well as the spectrum is exactly the same.
https://massbank.eu/MassBank/RecordDisplay.jsp?id=TY000228&dsn=Univ_Toyama
https://massbank.eu/MassBank/RecordDisplay.jsp?id=TY000237&dsn=Univ_Toyama
Maybe it is worth to search MassBank globally for such cases.
I guess we will have to contact the contributors in any case.
How to tackle this? I suggest to introduce a "DEPRECATED" tag for records which are duplicated (this issue) or noisy (e.g. #51) or otherwise erroneous (#9).