Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 36 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign up[REVIEW]: FSharpGephiStreamer: An idiomatic bridge between F# and network visualization #1445
Comments
whedon
assigned
danielskatz
May 13, 2019
whedon
added
the
review
label
May 13, 2019
whedon
referenced this issue
May 13, 2019
Closed
[PRE REVIEW]: FSharpGephiStreamer: An idiomatic bridge between F# and network visualization #1214
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. @cgravill, it looks like you're currently assigned as the reviewer for this paper If you haven't already, you should seriously consider unsubscribing from GitHub notifications for this (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews) repository. As a reviewer, you're probably currently watching this repository which means for GitHub's default behaviour you will receive notifications (emails) for all reviews To fix this do the following two things:
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
danielskatz
assigned
cgravill
May 13, 2019
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
danielskatz
commented
May 13, 2019
Please carry out your review in this issue by updating your checklist above. The checklist gives me some insight into the review process and any blocking issues, as well as being the full set of items that once passed will lead us to accept the submission. And please fully read the the top 2 comments in this issue. If you have any problems or questions, please feel free to let me know. |
whedon commentedMay 13, 2019
Submitting author: @muehlhaus (Timo Mühlhaus)
Repository: https://github.com/CSBiology/FSharpGephiStreamer
Version: v1.1.0
Editor: @danielskatz
Reviewer: @cgravill, @PrashantVaidyanathan
Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@cgravill & @PrashantVaidyanathan, please carry out your review in this issue by updating the checklist below. If you cannot edit the checklist please:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @danielskatz know.
Review checklist for @cgravill
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
paper.md
file include a list of authors with their affiliations?Review checklist for @PrashantVaidyanathan
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
paper.md
file include a list of authors with their affiliations?