Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 36 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign up[REVIEW]: coronagraph: Telescope Noise Modeling for Exoplanets in Python #1387
Comments
whedon
assigned
arfon
Apr 15, 2019
whedon
added
the
review
label
Apr 15, 2019
whedon
referenced this issue
Apr 15, 2019
Closed
[PRE REVIEW]: coronagraph: Telescope Noise Modeling for Exoplanets in Python #1380
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. @lpueyo it looks like you're currently assigned as the reviewer for this paper If you haven't already, you should seriously consider unsubscribing from GitHub notifications for this (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews) repository. As a reviewer, you're probably currently watching this repository which means for GitHub's default behaviour you will receive notifications (emails) for all reviews To fix this do the following two things:
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
danielskatz
commented
May 20, 2019
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
I've just followed up with @lpueyo over email. I think he might have just gone out on paternity leave... |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
danielskatz
commented
May 21, 2019
Maybe we need to find an alternate reviewer? |
whedon commentedApr 15, 2019
Submitting author: @jlustigy (Jacob Lustig-Yaeger)
Repository: https://github.com/jlustigy/coronagraph
Version: v0.1
Editor: @arfon
Reviewer: @lpueyo
Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@lpueyo, please carry out your review in this issue by updating the checklist below. If you cannot edit the checklist please:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.theoj.org/about#reviewer_guidelines. Any questions/concerns please let @arfon know.
Review checklist for @lpueyo
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
paper.md
file include a list of authors with their affiliations?