Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 36 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign up[REVIEW]: f90nml - A Python module for Fortran namelists #1474
Comments
whedon
assigned
danielskatz
May 24, 2019
whedon
added
the
review
label
May 24, 2019
whedon
referenced this issue
May 24, 2019
Closed
[PRE REVIEW]: f90nml - A Python module for Fortran namelists #1472
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. @zbeekman, it looks like you're currently assigned as the reviewer for this paper If you haven't already, you should seriously consider unsubscribing from GitHub notifications for this (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews) repository. As a reviewer, you're probably currently watching this repository which means for GitHub's default behaviour you will receive notifications (emails) for all reviews To fix this do the following two things:
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
danielskatz
commented
May 24, 2019
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
danielskatz
commented
May 24, 2019
As stated in the first comment in this issue, please carry out your review in this issue by updating the your checklist (above). Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.) Let me know if you have any problems or questions |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
I can't seem to tick any check boxes |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Works for me. Of course, I first started checking @zbeekman 's boxes ... But I then unchecked them. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
danielskatz
commented
May 24, 2019
Quoting the comment above:
I'm sure the first is ok - can you make sure you did the second? |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
I'd accepted already for a previous review. It started working just now. Thanks! |
whedon commentedMay 24, 2019
•
edited by zbeekman
Submitting author: @marshallward (Marshall Ward)
Repository: https://github.com/marshallward/f90nml
Version: v1.1
Editor: @danielskatz
Reviewer: @zbeekman, @tclune
Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@zbeekman & @tclune, please carry out your review in this issue by updating the checklist below. If you cannot edit the checklist please:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @danielskatz know.
Review checklist for @zbeekman
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
paper.md
file include a list of authors with their affiliations?Review checklist for @tclune
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
paper.md
file include a list of authors with their affiliations?