Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 28 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upChange field searches to use fields instead of handlers #45
Comments
ruebot
added
the
discussion
label
Oct 8, 2018
ruebot
self-assigned this
Oct 8, 2018
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
ianmilligan1
Oct 8, 2018
Member
I'm far from a Solr expert, so I'd defer to you and @anjackson, but going down this route makes perfect sense to me!
I'm far from a Solr expert, so I'd defer to you and @anjackson, but going down this route makes perfect sense to me! |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
ruebot
Oct 11, 2018
Member
After some good discussion in IIPC webarchive-discovery channel, I'm going to move forward with this. It'll make Warclight easier to implement for webarchive-discovery users.
After some good discussion in IIPC webarchive-discovery channel, I'm going to move forward with this. It'll make Warclight easier to implement for webarchive-discovery users. |
ruebot
referenced this issue
Oct 12, 2018
Closed
Use the default webarchive-discovery Solr 7 config #46
ruebot
closed this
in
3e034d2
Oct 12, 2018
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
ruebot commentedOct 8, 2018
If we do something similar to what @anjackson did in this commit, we'd leave less of a burden on the implementer to setup a custom
solrconfig.xml
like we ship here, and if they already have a Solr index two setup with the same or similarschema.xml
that webarchive-discovery ships, it would be an easier drop-in.warclight/lib/generators/warclight/templates/catalog_controller.rb
Lines 120 to 134 in ef0c872
Less things to maintain?
@anjackson @ianmilligan1 let me know what you think.