Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 36 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign up[REVIEW]: CSaransh: Software Suite to Study Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Collision Cascades #1461
Comments
whedon
assigned
katyhuff
May 20, 2019
whedon
added
the
review
label
May 20, 2019
whedon
referenced this issue
May 20, 2019
Closed
[PRE REVIEW]: CSaransh: Software Suite to Study Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Collision Cascades #1433
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. @jmborr, it looks like you're currently assigned as the reviewer for this paper If you haven't already, you should seriously consider unsubscribing from GitHub notifications for this (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews) repository. As a reviewer, you're probably currently watching this repository which means for GitHub's default behaviour you will receive notifications (emails) for all reviews To fix this do the following two things:
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
whedon
assigned
arose and
jmborr
May 21, 2019
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
mbobra
referenced this issue
Jun 5, 2019
Closed
Whedon only addresses one reviewer in some messages even if multiple are assigned #540
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
danielskatz
commented
Jun 18, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
whedon commentedMay 20, 2019
•
edited by arose
Submitting author: @haptork (Utkarsh Bhardwaj)
Repository: https://github.com/haptork/csaransh
Version: v0.3.1
Editor: @katyhuff
Reviewer: @jmborr, @arose
Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@jmborr & @arose, please carry out your review in this issue by updating the checklist below. If you cannot edit the checklist please:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @katyhuff know.
Review checklist for @jmborr
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
paper.md
file include a list of authors with their affiliations?Review checklist for @arose
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
paper.md
file include a list of authors with their affiliations?