Track tasks and feature requests
Join 36 million developers who use GitHub issues to help identify, assign, and keep track of the features and bug fixes your projects need.
Sign up for free See pricing for teams and enterprisesWhat can Scholia do with regard to highlighting data quality? #784
Comments
Daniel-Mietchen
added
outreach
missing-data
usability
completeness
labels
Jul 13, 2019
Daniel-Mietchen
added this to To do
in Meta
via automation
Jul 13, 2019
Daniel-Mietchen
added this to To do
in 6. Improving documentation of corpus, code, queries, workflows, examples and related resources, as well as limits of Scholia
via automation
Jul 13, 2019
Daniel-Mietchen
added this to To do
in 4. Enhancing Wikidata-based reference management for scholarly writing workflows
via automation
Jul 13, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Daniel-Mietchen commentedJul 13, 2019
We already highlight potential issues, e.g. publication timelines with gaps of decades, but we could perhaps do more, including making it simpler to find specific claims underlying a Scholia visualization (or gaps therein) and check the associated references.
In a way, this is similar to how we should handle predatory journals and conferences (cf. #352 ) and could include things like fake citation data.