Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 40 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upCheck Creatinine records #52
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
According to feedback from @tsufz these are indeed noise, with the wrong retention time and should be deprecated. @meier-rene are you able to deprecate the UFZ Creatinine records? Thanks! |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Can these be deprecated please? @meier-rene @tsufz |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
schymane commentedMar 24, 2019
There appear to be some creatinine records that are noise only or close too it where we should also consider removing poor records.
This one has good intensity, few peaks but looks fine, I've used it to compare:
https://massbank.eu/MassBank/RecordDisplay.jsp?id=SM868004&dsn=CASMI_2016
PK$PEAK: m/z int. rel.int.
57.0575 160462.5 2
58.0653 4760539.5 69
70.0653 149661.5 2
72.0445 776245.8 11
86.0713 4838806 71
114.0662 67953792 999
These ones are very low intensity, two have peaks that are clearly noise only, two have peaks that are in the peaklist above but still close to noise, missing other main peaks and I recommend actually to remove all four UF records ... again these failed QC by Herbert Oberacher.
https://massbank.eu/MassBank/RecordDisplay.jsp?id=UF412504&dsn=UFZ
one or two genuine peaks, rest noise, low I
https://massbank.eu/MassBank/RecordDisplay.jsp?id=UF412501&dsn=UFZ
noise only?
https://massbank.eu/MassBank/RecordDisplay.jsp?id=UF412503&dsn=UFZ
one or two genuine peaks, rest noise, low I
https://massbank.eu/MassBank/RecordDisplay.jsp?id=UF412502&dsn=UFZ
noise only?
@meier-rene @tsufz