Skip to content
Please note that GitHub no longer supports your web browser.

We recommend upgrading to the latest Google Chrome or Firefox.

Learn more

/BioHackathon-projects-2019

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Team Green is not FAIR #44

Open
egonw opened this issue Nov 19, 2019 · 6 comments
Labels
Team Green documentation enhancement help wanted

Comments

@egonw
Copy link
Contributor

@egonw egonw commented Nov 19, 2019

I got complaints that, particularly, Team Green is not FAIR. For example, we don't have identifiers for players (ORCID has been suggested) and we don't have ontologies to describe our skills. I mean, seriously, I cannot find anything on BioPortal for "I would kill for the nomination"! :(
@egonw egonw added the Team Green label Nov 19, 2019
@rwwh

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link

@rwwh rwwh commented Nov 19, 2019 •
edited

I have an issue with this issue: it looks more like an epic than a story....
Lets split it up:

  • FAIR metrics for teams.
  • We need proper identifiers for the contenders
  • We need to identify a tabletennis skill ontology, or something more generic that can be made to fit

The first one we can solve each individually using our team document.
For GDPR reasons I will not post the link here....

We really have to make sure to become the most FAIR team. FAIR play FTW!
@schymane

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Contributor

@schymane schymane commented Nov 19, 2019

I FAIRified my response ;-)
Surely we need a FAIR play prize? (a la "spirit" prize in Ultimate Frisbee?)
@DeniseSl22

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link

@DeniseSl22 DeniseSl22 commented Nov 19, 2019

We could start building the ontology with this resources; tennis is close enough to table tennis right?
@rombaum

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link

@rombaum rombaum commented Nov 19, 2019

@DeniseSl22 can we merge this skills with table skills & techniques? I think then we will be on a good way.
@MarekSuchanek

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link

@MarekSuchanek MarekSuchanek commented Nov 19, 2019 •
edited

@DeniseSl22 @rombaum Great ideas 👍 🎾 I think that instead of merging, it should be more convenient to run some automatic ontology mapping tool to find an alignment with correspondences between tennis and table-use vocabularies. For example, semantic relation between o1:serve (a table) and o2:serve (a tennis ball) or o1:BreakPoint (point that could result to win) and o2:BreakPoint (point that is the result of the loss, since it is where your table broke).
@uniqueg

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link
Member

@uniqueg uniqueg commented Nov 20, 2019

I think the labels "Team Green" and "help wanted" are redundant.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Team Green documentation enhancement help wanted
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
7 participants
@egonw @rwwh @schymane @DeniseSl22 @rombaum @MarekSuchanek @uniqueg
You can’t perform that action at this time.