Skip to content
Please note that GitHub no longer supports your web browser.

We recommend upgrading to the latest Google Chrome or Firefox.

Learn more
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRE REVIEW]: EvoMaster: A Search-Based System Test Generation Tool #2001

Open
whedon opened this issue Jan 7, 2020 · 12 comments
Open

[PRE REVIEW]: EvoMaster: A Search-Based System Test Generation Tool #2001

whedon opened this issue Jan 7, 2020 · 12 comments
Assignees

Comments

@whedon
Copy link
Collaborator

@whedon whedon commented Jan 7, 2020

Submitting author: @arcuri82 (Andrea Arcuri)
Repository: https://github.com/EMResearch/EvoMaster
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: @gkthiruvathukal
Reviewer: Pending

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @arcuri82. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@arcuri82 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
@whedon whedon added the pre-review label Jan 7, 2020
@whedon

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@whedon whedon commented Jan 7, 2020

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf
@whedon

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@whedon whedon commented Jan 7, 2020

Reference check summary:

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1109/icst.2018.00046 may be missing for title: EvoMaster: Evolutionary Multi-context Automated System Test Generation
- https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66299-2_1 may be missing for title: Many Independent Objective (MIO) Algorithm for Test Suite Generation
- https://doi.org/10.1109/qrs.2017.11 may be missing for title: RESTful API Automated Test Case Generation
- https://doi.org/10.1145/3321707.3321815 may be missing for title: Resource-based test case generation for RESTful web services
- https://doi.org/10.1145/3321707.3321732 may be missing for title: SQL data generation to enhance Search-Based System Testing

INVALID DOIs

- None
@whedon

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@whedon whedon commented Jan 7, 2020

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84  T=3.53 s (299.8 files/s, 43053.9 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JSON                            27              0              0          56714
Kotlin                         455          10873           6106          34479
Java                           508           8276           3678          24565
Maven                           20            269            146           2146
Markdown                        13            356              0           1043
SQL                             23            230              0           1027
R                                2            152             24            359
ANTLR Grammar                    4            193            189            356
Python                           1            155            112            286
TeX                              1              9              0             66
YAML                             3             28             14             60
XML                              1              8              3             20
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                          1058          20549          10272         121121
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@whedon

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@whedon whedon commented Jan 7, 2020

@danielskatz

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

@danielskatz danielskatz commented Jan 7, 2020

👋 @gkthiruvathukal - would you be willing to edit this JOSS submission?

@arcuri82

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator

@arcuri82 arcuri82 commented Jan 7, 2020

Hi. Looking at the review list starting from bottom, some possibilities could be:
mado89, bzz, chrisma and neurons

@danielskatz

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

@danielskatz danielskatz commented Jan 9, 2020

👋 @gkthiruvathukal - a 2nd ping...

@gkthiruvathukal

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

@gkthiruvathukal gkthiruvathukal commented Jan 9, 2020

So sorry, @danielskatz. I'm definitely willing to edit this submission. Will assign myself now and get it started.

@gkthiruvathukal

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

@gkthiruvathukal gkthiruvathukal commented Jan 9, 2020

@whedon assign @gkthiruvathukal as editor

@whedon

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@whedon whedon commented Jan 9, 2020

OK, the editor is @gkthiruvathukal

@gkthiruvathukal

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

@gkthiruvathukal gkthiruvathukal commented Jan 9, 2020

@mado89, are you willing to contribute a review or this submission?

@gkthiruvathukal

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

@gkthiruvathukal gkthiruvathukal commented Jan 9, 2020

@bzz, are you willing to contribute a review for this submission? (I need two reviewers.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
4 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.