Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 40 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upUpdating suggested editor flow #665
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This change aligns the behavior of whedon to the workflow already adopted by EiCs, which is to bypass automatic assignment of a handling editor, and ask for the editor's agreement—after considering not only topic of the submission but also editor load. Because EiCs invite handling editors taking into account their load, and possibly if they are |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
I agree with @labarba's suggestion, but otherwise this looks good to me |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Thanks for the feedback @labarba and @danielskatz! |
* Updating suggested editor flow * Updating language based on feedback
arfon commentedJan 12, 2020
This is a small update to the submission flow when authors suggest the handling editor on the JOSS submission form. Currently an EiC has to decide between:
With this update, suggestions by submitting authors are just that. Even if the EiC keeps this suggestion on the JOSS dashboard, it will only show up in the reviews repository as a small amount of additional language from Whedon:
@openjournals/joss-eics