Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 40 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign up[REVIEW]: LATTE: Lightcurve Analysis Tool for Transiting Exoplanets #2101
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. @christinahedges, @aureliocarnero it looks like you're currently assigned to review this paper If you haven't already, you should seriously consider unsubscribing from GitHub notifications for this (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews) repository. As a reviewer, you're probably currently watching this repository which means for GitHub's default behaviour you will receive notifications (emails) for all reviews To fix this do the following two things:
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@christinahedges, @aureliocarnero, @noraeisner: this is the review thread for the paper. All of our communications will happen here from now on. Both reviewers have checklists at the top of this thread with the JOSS requirements. As you go over the submission, please check any items that you feel have been satisfied. There are also links to the JOSS reviewer guidelines. The JOSS review is different from most other journals. Our goal is to work with the authors to help them meet our criteria instead of merely passing judgment on the submission. As such, the reviewers are encouraged to submit issues and pull requests on the software repository. When doing so, please mention We aim for reviews to be completed within about 2-4 weeks. Please let me know if any of you require some more time. We can also use Whedon (our bot) to set automatic reminders if you know you'll be away for a known period of time. Please feel free to ask me (or the submitting author, or each other) if you have any questions :) |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@xuanxu - be aware that being in an active collaboration is a conflict - perhaps this review can be completed before the collaboration between @christinahedges and the authors starts |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@danielskatz Agreed. By her comment I understood that she is not collaborating yet and I assumed there was time enough for the review to finish before the visit, but you are right that's just an assumption I made. @christinahedges can you please clarify this point? |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Hi @xuanxu and @danielskatz, yes I am not currently collaborating with Norah, our collaboration starts in a few months. If you're happy this is not a conflict then I'm happy! |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
sounds good to me |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
whedon commentedFeb 13, 2020
Submitting author: @noraeisner (N. L. Eisner)
Repository: https://github.com/noraeisner/LATTE
Version: v0.0.12
Editor: @xuanxu
Reviewer: @christinahedges, @aureliocarnero
Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@christinahedges & @aureliocarnero, please carry out your review in this issue by updating the checklist below. If you cannot edit the checklist please:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @xuanxu know.
Review checklist for @christinahedges
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
Review checklist for @aureliocarnero
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper