Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 40 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upIssues I found with the COPPE-ABNT style. #4647
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@AraujoH: for 3. The ABNT-UFPR style does just what you expect, but I find it annoying. @adam3smith 's solution is better. |
AraujoH commentedMar 27, 2020
Hi,
I have found some issues with the style universidade-federal-do-rio-de-janeiro-instituto-alberto-luiz-coimbra-de-pos-graduacao-e-pesquisa-de-engenharia-abnt.csl that I'd like to make known. I'm not sure if it's important to say but I'm using this citation style through Mendeley's MS-Word plug-in. I also feel like saying maybe these issues may have to do more with Mendeley than the citation itself. In this case, I apologize. But here are a list of things I found that got my attention for being out of what I expected:
I noticed that if I have "Notes" that I wrote about an article/book section/any-other-publication, these notes will be part of the "Bibliography" of my text. I don't think this is supposed to happen.
Sometimes, even after I delete all references to a certain publication in my text, the citation will keep occurring in the "Bibliography".
So far, by using this style, I have noticed that author's names will show up in parenthesis no matter what. According to ABNT, whenever the author's name(s) is(are) part of the sentence, it(they) should appear without parenthesis. For example:
SMITH, J. (2010) claims A is not equal B.
When the reference to an author is indirect, then the entire citation comes inside parenthesis. E.g.:
It is claimed that A is not equal B (SMITH, J., 2010).
Thank you for your time.