Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 40 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign up[PRE REVIEW]: Jabberwocky: an ontology-aware toolkit for manipulating text #2140
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman Thanks! Previously I submitted Jabberwocky with a single command, which allowed users to retrieve key elements from a text corpus using an ontology’s terms. Jabberwocky is the first tool to use an ontology directly. However, I understand the feedback that Jabberwocky was a minor-utility package and so I significantly expanded to include more functionality that demonstrates its utility in developing and maintaining ontologies, as well as querying text. This updated version of Jabberwocky includes two new subcommands, which together combine to make a workflow for users. Jabberwocky can now perform a tf-idf analysis on textual data to select key terms, and annotate those key terms in the ontology. Users can iteratively use these commands to identify and incrementally add new synonyms to expand their ontology. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Dear authors and reviewers We wanted to notify you that in light of the current COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS has decided to suspend submission of new manuscripts and to handle existing manuscripts (such as this one) on a "best efforts basis". We understand that you may need to attend to more pressing issues than completing a review or updating a repository in response to a review. If this is the case, a quick note indicating that you need to put a "pause" on your involvement with a review would be appreciated but is not required. Thanks in advance for your understanding. Arfon Smith, Editor in Chief, on behalf of the JOSS editorial team. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@majensen has been invited to edit this submission. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
OK, the editor is @majensen |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@wdduncan -- would you be willing to review this software for JOSS? Information about reviewing is available here. Please let me know here or via other channels - thanks for considering! --@majensen |
whedon commentedMar 4, 2020
•
edited
Submitting author: @sap218 (Samantha Pendleton)
Repository: https://github.com/sap218/jabberwocky
Version: v0.5.0.1
Editor: @majensen
Reviewer: Pending
Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @sap218. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@sap218 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type: