Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correctly handle homonymous lexemes #3

Open
Nudin opened this issue Sep 28, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Correctly handle homonymous lexemes #3

Nudin opened this issue Sep 28, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@Nudin
Copy link
Owner

@Nudin Nudin commented Sep 28, 2019

Sometime two Lexemes have the same language and lemma but are still different (Homonym). In these cases the sense should be added to the right Lexeme. Ideally the user should be asked which Lexeme to pick.

Right now the sense will be matched and added to both – thus will be added to the wrong Lexemes.

@Nudin
Copy link
Owner Author

@Nudin Nudin commented Sep 28, 2019

So that we don't add wrong data, I semi-manually removed all homonyms from the database.

@Nudin Nudin added the bug label Sep 28, 2019
@Daniel-Mietchen
Copy link

@Daniel-Mietchen Daniel-Mietchen commented May 20, 2020

Here is another case: the target lexeme is Das Tag but the suggested glosses are all about Der Tag.
Screen Shot 2020-05-19 at 20 05 12

To make things worse, there is a whole range of different concepts described using the string "Tag" in German, e.g. as per https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tag_(Begriffskl%C3%A4rung) , some of which have already been confused by users of the tool (e.g. as per this revert).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
2 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.