Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRE REVIEW]: PupillometryR: An R package for preparing and analysing pupillometry data #2200

Open
whedon opened this issue May 21, 2020 · 11 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@whedon
Copy link
Collaborator

@whedon whedon commented May 21, 2020

Submitting author: @samhforbes (Samuel Forbes)
Repository: https://github.com/samhforbes/PupillometryR
Version: 0.0.2
Editor: @oliviaguest
Reviewers: @paulinepalma
Managing EiC: Kristen Thyng

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @samhforbes. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

The author's suggestion for the handling editor is @oliviaguest.

@samhforbes if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
@whedon whedon added the pre-review label May 21, 2020
@whedon
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@whedon whedon commented May 21, 2020

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf
@whedon
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@whedon whedon commented May 21, 2020

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84  T=4.62 s (14.1 files/s, 23859.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SVG                             50              0              0         106758
R                               11            228            683            832
HTML                             1             97              3            682
Markdown                         2            171              0            607
TeX                              1             16              0            171
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            65            512            686         109050
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '2200' was gathered on 2020/05/21.
No commited files with the specified extensions were found.
@whedon whedon added R TeX labels May 21, 2020
@whedon
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@whedon whedon commented May 21, 2020

Reference check summary:

OK DOIs

- 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15191.1 is OK
- 10.3758/s13428-017-1007-2 is OK
- 10.3758/s13428-018-01190-1 is OK
- 10.31234/osf.io/gvcxb is OK
- 10.1007/978-1-4757-7107-7 is OK
- 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00805.x is OK
- 10.3758/s13428-011-0109-5 is OK
- 10.1177/2331216519832483 is OK
- 10.3758/s13423-018-1432-y is OK
- 10.1177/2331216518800869 is OK
- 10.1126/science.143.3611.1190 is OK
- 10.1037/h0026952 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None
@whedon
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@whedon whedon commented May 21, 2020

@kthyng
Copy link

@kthyng kthyng commented May 21, 2020

Hi @oliviaguest! You were the suggested handling editor for this submission. I'm hoping to get some extra eyes on this submission being in scope given that the number of lines of code shown above is a bit low for a typical submission (being below 1000 for the number of lines of R code).

Given all this, are you able to edit this submission? Thanks!

@oliviaguest
Copy link
Member

@oliviaguest oliviaguest commented May 21, 2020

I sure can — lemme know when to move to find reviewers.

@danielskatz
Copy link

@danielskatz danielskatz commented May 21, 2020

@whedon assign @oliviaguest as editor

@whedon
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@whedon whedon commented May 21, 2020

OK, the editor is @oliviaguest

@danielskatz
Copy link

@danielskatz danielskatz commented May 21, 2020

lemme know when to move to find reviewers

Go for it!

@oliviaguest
Copy link
Member

@oliviaguest oliviaguest commented May 21, 2020

@whedon add @paulinepalma as reviewer

@whedon whedon assigned oliviaguest and unassigned oliviaguest May 21, 2020
@whedon
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@whedon whedon commented May 21, 2020

OK, @paulinepalma is now a reviewer

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
4 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.