Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84  T=0.01 s (326.9 files/s, 19720.7 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Markdown                         2             21              0             95
TeX                              1              6              0             59
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                             3             27              0            154
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '2230' was gathered on 2020/05/22.
No commited files with the specified extensions were found.

Reference check summary:

OK DOIs

- 10.5281/zenodo.3702783 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.3820769 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55696-3_3 may be missing for title: Differentiable genetic programming
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10710-010-9112-3 may be missing for title: Human-competitive results produced by genetic programming
- https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17310-3_2 may be missing for title: Cartesian genetic programming
- https://doi.org/10.1145/3319619.3322003 may be missing for title: Neural network architecture search with differentiable cartesian genetic programming for regression

INVALID DOIs

- None

👋 @darioizzo - thanks for your submission to JOSS. Do you think you could move this paper into the same repository as the software?

As described in our blog post announcing the reopening of JOSS, we're currently working in a "reduced service mode", limiting the number of papers assigned to any individual editor.

Since reopening JOSS earlier in the week we've had > 50 papers submitted and as such, yours has been put in our backlog that we will be working through over the coming weeks and months.

Thanks in advance for your patience!

👉 Check article proof 📄 👈

@arfon I would rather keep the repositories for the code and this paper separate. The reasons are that the code will evolve and change, while the paper, if published should stay unmodified. I also do not like having too many files in the root folder of the code repository (but thats a matter of taste).

I could make a branch with the paper only if thats better?

Going through the reviewer list, I noticed the entry Ohjeah and henrik227 that seems to me as a good fit for this paper since they have indicated interest in symbolic regression, thus I am daring suggesting them.

I could make a branch with the paper only if thats better?

Yes, a branch would be better than what we have currently here. Also, the paper can be anywhere in the repository (i.e. nested in a folder) so doesn't need to be in the repository root.

@arfon I have moved all files to a branch in the repository https://github.com/darioizzo/dcgp/tree/joss-paper-v1.5.1

@whedon generate pdf from branch joss-paper-v1.5.1

Attempting PDF compilation from custom branch joss-paper-v1.5.1. Reticulating splines etc...

👉 Check article proof 📄 👈

proof looks ok to me.

👋 @VivianePons - would you be able to edit this submission for JOSS?

@whedon invite @VivianePons as editor

@VivianePons has been invited to edit this submission.

Sure

@whedon assign @VivianePons as editor

OK, the editor is @VivianePons