Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84  T=0.37 s (729.3 files/s, 49996.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rmd                            204           3663           5088           5438
R                               54            727            697           1518
Markdown                         6             77              0            548
XML                              1              0              2            441
YAML                             2             18              1            113
TeX                              1              4              0             37
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           268           4489           5788           8095
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '2271' was gathered on 2020/05/28.
No commited files with the specified extensions were found.

Reference check summary:

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30120-1 may be missing for title: An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time

INVALID DOIs

- None

👉 Check article proof 📄 👈

from the author

We point toward the R package for the Data Hub, but are actually asking for the review of the full data hub. The distinction is clear in the paper I believe.

👋 @ArdiaD - Thanks for your submission to JOSS. As described in our blog post announcing the reopening of JOSS, we're currently working in a "reduced service mode", limiting the number of papers assigned to any individual editor.

Since reopening JOSS last week, we've had > 60 papers submitted and as such, yours has been put in our backlog that we will be working through over the coming weeks and months.

Thanks in advance for your patience!

(In the meantime, feel free to make any needed fixes to the paper, such as adding the possibly missing DOI, etc. - add @whedon generate pdf as a new comment in this thread to build the pdf)

@whedon commands

Here are some things you can ask me to do:

# List Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands

# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors

# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers

EDITORIAL TASKS

# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf

# Compile the paper from alternative branch
@whedon generate pdf from branch custom-branch-name

# Ask Whedon to check the references for missing DOIs
@whedon check references

# Ask Whedon to check repository statistics for the submitted software
@whedon check repository

@whedon list reviewers

Here's the current list of reviewers: https://bit.ly/joss-reviewers

@ArdiaD would be happy to review

I'm confused by this, since @ArdiaD is the author

if looking for reviewers still I would be happy to review

@danielskatz I am happy if @mbod reviews the data hub

Thanks @mbod for volunteering. As you can see, this submission is currently waitlisted, so there's not even an editor assigned yet, who will pick reviewers. We'll keep your offer here for the editor to potentially accept once the submission moves off the waitlist.