Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

@whedon generate pdf

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84  T=1.30 s (64.8 files/s, 16664.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSS                              1              0             14           6844
R                               65           1659           1494           4487
SVG                              1              1              1           3708
HTML                             6            279             18           1426
TeX                              4             31              4            673
Rmd                              3            259            183            243
Markdown                         4            115              0            163
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            84           2344           1714          17544
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

👉 Check article proof 📄 👈

👋 @danielskatz - would you be willing to edit this for JOSS?

@whedon invite @danielskatz as editor

@danielskatz has been invited to edit this submission.

@whedon assign me as editor

@arfon - I don't think this will work, but it should

not even an error...

@whedon assign @danielskatz as editor

OK, the editor is @danielskatz

👋 @jcolomb - thanks for your submission to JOSS. Could you take a look a this list of potential reviewers and identify a few people who would be good candidates to review this submission?

@whedon assign me as editor

@arfon - I don't think this will work, but it should

Agreed. It should!

looking for R, machine learning, statistics, (and not epidemiology) none found for Rshiny.
(PS would be cool to have a possibility to filter that list, maybe directly from the result of whedon software report ?).

nhejazi
jayrobwilliams
ati-ozgur
rcannood

We have a bunch of ideas for potential changes in progress to make this process better, and hope to start implementing them soon

👋 @nhejazi - Would you be willing to review this submission?

👋 @jayrobwilliams - Would you be willing to review this submission?

👋 @ati-ozgur - Would you be willing to review this submission?

👋 @rcannood - Would you be willing to review this submission?

@danielskatz unfortunately I don't have time to review this submission at the moment.

👋 @nhejazi, @ati-ozgur, @rcannood - Would you be willing to review this JOSS submission?

👋 @jcolomb - Can I ask if you might have additional thoughts on potential reviewers?

👋 @amoeba, @brylie, @DominiqueMakowski, @mikerspencer, @aj2duncan - would one or two of you be willing to review this JOSS submission?

Hi @danielskatz, thanks for the invite, unfortunately, I feel like this is really outside my domain. Sorry, and good luck!

Yes, I can review this. It's my first piece for this journal, so I may need a little hand-holding.

@danielskatz I'm happy to review this too.

Thanks to @mikerspencer and @aj2duncan - we will go ahead with a review in a few minutes (and in a new thread after more commands to whedon). Mike, please feel free to ask questions as needed, but I hope the fact that the process is checklist-driven will make this reasonably clear and easy.

@whedon assign @mikerspencer as reviewer

OK, @mikerspencer is now a reviewer

@whedon add @aj2duncan as reviewer

OK, @aj2duncan is now a reviewer

@whedon start review

OK, I've started the review over in #2282.