Skip to content

/ cito-editorial

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

What if you have multiple cito categories for one ref? #2

Open
schymane opened this issue Jun 25, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

What if you have multiple cito categories for one ref? #2

schymane opened this issue Jun 25, 2020 · 2 comments
Assignees
@egonw

Comments

@schymane
Copy link
Contributor

@schymane schymane commented Jun 25, 2020

Hi @egonw this is a really good read and I think clear ... do you have any guidance on how you would like people to deal with the case where you may have multiple cito categories?
For instance, if we build on the MetFrag paper (DOI: 10.1186/s13321-016-0115-9) we will have cito:citesAsDataSource for the evaluation data and cito:usesMethodIn if we use the code ... do you prefer[cito:citesAsDataSource] [cito:usesMethodIn] or e.g. [cito:citesAsDataSource, cito:usesMethodIn] or similar variant?
@egonw
Copy link
Contributor

@egonw egonw commented Jun 25, 2020

Yes, this came up in an email discussion too. I want the first option ([cito:citesAsDataSource] [cito:usesMethodIn]) and will include this in the write up.
@egonw egonw self-assigned this Jun 25, 2020
@schymane
Copy link
Contributor Author

@schymane schymane commented Jun 25, 2020

Agree with the first option too. Avoids all sorts of potential separator issues ...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@egonw egonw

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Linked pull requests

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

None yet
2 participants
@egonw @schymane
You can’t perform that action at this time.