Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 50 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upInconsistent UNF values #19
Open
Labels
Comments
Thanks for this report. Definitely concerning but I'm wondering if it's unique to R 4.0.0. I'm not seeing these in 4.0.2 nor any issues on CRAN. It's been a long time since I've looked at this code so it's definitely possible there's a problem but there's an intentionally thorough test suite to catch these kinds of things, so I'm hopeful it's an upstream problem that has since been resolved. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
dhicks commentedJun 27, 2020
This morning I'm working with some data that hasn't been touched since November (over 7 months ago). I'm the maintainer for this data, it lives on my personal machine, and I use UNF to validate which version of the dataset I'm working with. Today I'm getting UNF values that are inconsistent with values calculated last November. I'm getting similar inconsistencies for some of the examples in
?unf
(shown below). In particular I'm getting inconsistencies forunf(longley, ver=4, digits=3)
andunf(cbind.data.frame(x1,x2),ver=3)
and its equivalents. The UNFs for my data were calculated using version 6.Both calculations were done using
UNF
version 2.0.6 on the same machine. One potential difference is last November I was using R 3.5.1 and today I'm using R 4.0.0.Please specify whether your issue is about:
Put your code here:
Created on 2020-06-27 by the reprex package (v0.3.0)