Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 50 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upChanges to Syntax for Metabolomics USIs #250
Open
Comments
... this is all fair enough and understandable (and hopefully achievable?), semantically I am not a fan of |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
meier-rene commentedJun 30, 2020
We got this information:
Letting you all know, Wout and I had a few conversations with the
Proteomics USI team about identifiers that would conform in style to
proteomics spectral libraries. There are basically 3 changes that
we'd need to do that would simply require in most cases an
few characters on your side. These are basically made to support
versioning of spectra if that were the case (though likely we
wouldn't have it on the GNPS side but would be consistent with
Proteomics libraries).
These are the changes that would happen for libraries
specifically been verified by the PSI USI folks
identifier (fifth block)
mzspec:MASSBANK:SM858102 -> mzdraft:MASSBANK::accession:SM858102
mzspec:MOTIFDB:motif:171163 -> mzdraft:MOTIFDB::accession:171163
For our own analysis tasks
specifically been verified by the PSI USI folks
identifier (fifth block)
mzspec:MS2LDATASK-38:document:43062 -> mzdraft:MS2LDA:TASK-
190:accession:43062
mzspec:GNPSTASK-
c95481f0c53d42e78a61bf899e9f9adb:spectra/specs_ms.mgf:scan:1943 ->
mzdraft:GNPS:TASK-c95481f0c53d42e78a61bf899e9f9adb-
spectra/specs_ms.mgf:scan:1943
Wout and I have already updated the metabolomics USI website to
handle these new styles, but have not merged/deployed.
What we need from you:
style
Once we have all these in place along, we will switch everything over
on the resolution side to make sure we have minimal downtime.
I was hoping we'd aim for 2 weeks from now to make the change. Let me
know if that works for you all!