Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 40 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upRecent ships #674
Recent ships #674
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
Re the first upgrade, which is great, a future next step would be to have a pulldown where the citation could be exported in a variety of formats - I think @mfenner knows how to do this... |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
The easiest way to do this is to use DOI content negotiation to get back the formatted citation, works in any language :). What we have done in DataCite Search and Crossref Metadata Search (originally same source code at https://github.com/crosscite/doi-metadata-search) is hardwire some common styles in a Javascript popup window. You could of course do something similar in a Ruby view. Crossref and DataCite currently run a separate backend service for citation formatting, but the DataCite service (source code at https://github.com/crosscite/content-negotiation) supports Crossref DOIs, and is arguably better maintained. DataCite content negotiation supports providing the content type via header or via path: or https://data.crosscite.org/text/x-bibliography/10.21105/joss.02004?style=ieee Our content negotiation of course also supports bibtex: https://data.crosscite.org/application/x-bibtex/10.21105/joss.02004 |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
For a tighter integration you could also use the |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
The next step is to write out a roadmap, and place feature ideas and requests in some form of priority list. Otherwise important dev work that is harder to complete gets eternally delayed, trumped by shiny nice-to-haves that are easy to do. |
I thought it might be good for @openjournals/dev start documenting updates/improvements that have been made recently to JOSS/Whedon etc. in a semi-regular fashion so here's a summary of what's happened recently:
Better support for BibTeX in JOSS & JOSE UI: There's now a couple of links on the JOSS and JOSE paper view which allows for copying of the citation string (the thing shown in the UI) or a BibTeX entry.
Sortable table on editor dashboard: It's now possible to sort the list of editors by the number of assignments they have on the dashboard.
EiC information now shown on pre-review issue: The
pre-reviewissue now shows which EiC opened up this issue on GitHub #669Whedon support for withdrawing and rejecting papers: Papers can now be rejected and withdrawn by Whedon #662 #671 openjournals/whedon-api#81 openjournals/whedon-api#79
Better errors in Whedon paper preview service: Whedon now reports errors properly in the preview service openjournals/whedon-api#80
Email invites for authors: It's now possible to invite editors to edit a paper, with an automated email sent to them #673 openjournals/whedon-api#82
Repository statistics now reported in pre-review issue: In order to help editors make decisions about whether submissions are in scope, Whedon now reports some summary statistics in the
pre-reviewthread about the repository openjournals/whedon-api#77/ cc @openjournals/jose-editors @openjournals/joss-editors