Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

⚠️ JOSS reduced service mode ⚠️

Due to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, JOSS is currently operating in a "reduced service mode". You can read more about what that means in our blog post.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

👋 @adbar - thanks for your submission to JOSS. From a quick inspection of this submission it's not entirely obvious that it meets our submission criteria. In particular, this item:

• Your software should have an obvious research application

Could you confirm here that there is a research application for this software (and explain what that application is)? The section 'what should my paper contain' has some guidance for the sort of content we're looking to be present in the paper.md.

Many thanks!

Software report (experimental):

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.84  T=5.05 s (51.8 files/s, 49499.8 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTML                           236          53096          10389         181722
Python                          12            307            776           2484
reStructuredText                 5            261            232            231
Markdown                         3             98              0            170
TeX                              1             16              0            133
YAML                             2              9              3            124
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
INI                              1              3              6             15
make                             1              4              7              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                           262          53802          11414         184914
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Statistical information for the repository '2360' was gathered on 2020/06/18.
The following historical commit information, by author, was found:

Author                     Commits    Insertions      Deletions    % of changes
Adrien Barbaresi               239          8040           4514           99.60
DerKozmonaut                     4            34              2            0.29
Vincent Barbaresi                1             4             10            0.11

Below are the number of rows from each author that have survived and are still
intact in the current revision:

Author                     Rows      Stability          Age       % in comments
Adrien Barbaresi           3566           44.4          8.5               12.25
DerKozmonaut                  1            2.9         10.8              100.00

Reference check summary:

OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1515/zgl-2017-0017 may be missing for title: Die Korpusplattform des "Digitalen Wörterbuchs der deutschen Sprache" (DWDS)
- https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w16-2602 may be missing for title: Efficient construction of metadata-enhanced web corpora
- https://doi.org/10.1162/coli.2007.33.1.147 may be missing for title: Googleology is bad science
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-009-9081-4 may be missing for title: The WaCky Wide Web: a collection of very large linguistically processed web-crawled corpora

INVALID DOIs

- None

👉 Check article proof 📄 👈

@whedon assign me as editor

OK, the editor is @danielskatz

@adbar - In the introduction to your paper, please add some text to describe the kinds of research that will use this software. For example, on your readme, you mention "methodological approach to derive information from web documents in order to build text databases for research (chiefly linguistics and natural language processing). There are web pages for which neither the URL nor the server response provide a reliable way to find out when a document was published or modified." It would be useful to put some of this concept/info into the paper

Also, note that some of your references are missing DOIs. After making changes, write a new comment in this thread with @whedon generate pdf to regenerate the PDF, and use @whedon check references to check the references. Also note that whedon sometimes gets references wrong, and makes incorrect suggestions, so please check these.

Finally, please suggest potential reviewers by mentioning them here in this thread (by github username, if they have one, without tagging them with an @). This list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).

👋 @adbar - Can you confirm that you've seen the requests to you? And when do you think you might have an updated paper ready, along with reviewer suggestions?

Thank you for your feedback! I've seen the requests and I will try to improve the text accordingly. I'm planning to have it done by the end of next week.

I reviewed the introduction and added the missing DOIs.
@whedon generate pdf
@whedon check references

Reviewers suggested: ajoer, hadware, tresoldi, geoffbacon, proycon
Are further requirements needed for the pre-reviewing phase?

@adbar - commands to whedon need to be the first thing in a comment, and there can only be one per comment

@whedon generate pdf

👉 Check article proof 📄 👈

@whedon check references

Reference check summary:

OK DOIs

- 10.1515/zgl-2017-0017 is OK
- 10.18653/v1/w16-2602 is OK
- 10.1162/coli.2007.33.1.147 is OK
- 10.1007/s10579-009-9081-4 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

👋 @ajoer - Would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

👋 @geoffbacon - Would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

Hi @danielskatz - I'd be happy to!

Thanks - I'll add you in the system, though we won't start the review until we get one more reviewer.

@whedon assign @geoffbacon as reviewer

OK, @geoffbacon is now a reviewer

👋 @proycon - Would you be willing to review this submission for JOSS?

@danielskatz Sure, I'd be glad to help!

Thanks - I'll add you and start the review.

@whedon add @proycon as reviewer

OK, @proycon is now a reviewer

@whedon start review

OK, I've started the review over in #2439.