Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 28 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign up[PRE REVIEW]: dlmmc: Dynamical linear model regression for atmospheric time-series analysis #1140
Comments
whedon
added
the
pre-review
label
Dec 22, 2018
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
What happens now? This submission is currently in a You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
whedon
added
Jupyter Notebook
Python
TeX
labels
Dec 22, 2018
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
PDF failed to compile for issue #1140 with the following error: /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.4.0/bundler/gems/whedon-443822f01563/lib/whedon/author.rb:58:in |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@whedon generate pdf |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@whedon assign @danielskatz as editor |
whedon
assigned
danielskatz
Dec 28, 2018
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
OK, the editor is @danielskatz |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Also, do you have suggestions for reviewers? In particular, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission, though if you have suggestions outside the list, that's great too. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Also, as we get this started, please be aware of the review criteria that will be used, and make any other changes needed to make the review easier. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
justinalsing
commented
Dec 30, 2018
@whedon generate pdf
… On Dec 28, 2018, at 5:52 PM, Daniel S. Katz ***@***.***> wrote:
Also, as we get this started, please be aware of the review criteria <https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html> that will be used, and make any other changes needed to make the review easier.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1140 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AXjdsZLWwF-36axGol7HcTBzLy3RdY94ks5u9kxrgaJpZM4ZfjS8>.
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
justinalsing
commented
Jan 3, 2019
Hi @danielskatz I did a quick search through the list of reviewers for people with expertise in python, time-series analysis, and (bayesian) statistics, and came up with this short-list ejolly That's probably a sensible place to start, I'll let you know if I come up with any more/better suggestions Thanks, |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
justinalsing
commented
Jan 3, 2019
Other possible suitable reviewers (expertise in python and climate science) jtmiclat |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
justinalsing
commented
Jan 3, 2019
I was also recommended mathause (not on the list of JOSS reviewers) by a colleague as probably well placed to review this code |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
looks interesting @danielskatz. I would be willing to review it but I won't be available before January 16th. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Thanks @Chilipp - this might be ok - let me see who else responds |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@danielskatz If it's fine, I can get to it in a couple of weeks as well because of ECP and AMS conferences. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@danielskatz, sure I'm able to review this. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Thanks @taqtiqa-mark. I would like to find two reviewers, and as you can see, a couple of other people are willing to review but not for a couple of weeks. If I can find one more person willing to review soon, we'll start; otherwise, we'll start in a day or two with the expectation that the second review will be a bit later than yours. So hold on for a day or two... |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
mathause
commented
Jan 4, 2019
I could also only start to review mid/ end of January. So I suppose others are able to do it earlier than me. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
I'm going to wait one more day to see if anyone I've mentioned can start a review immediately, and if not, we'll start anyhow with the expectation that one reviewer won't start until mid January. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
ejolly
commented
Jan 6, 2019
Sorry for the delayed response @danielskatz I've been traveling with limited access to email. Unfortunately, I too won't be able to start a review until the end of this month. Happy to do it then if that timeline works/makes sense. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Ok, let's go ahead with @taqtiqa-mark and @Chilipp, recognizing that @Chilipp won't be able to start for another week. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@whedon assign @taqtiqa-mark as reviewer |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
whedon
assigned
Chilipp and
danielskatz
and unassigned
danielskatz
Jan 7, 2019
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
OK, @Chilipp is now a reviewer |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@whedon add @taqtiqa-mark as reviewer |
whedon
assigned
Chilipp and
danielskatz
and unassigned
danielskatz and
Chilipp
Jan 7, 2019
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
OK, @taqtiqa-mark is now a reviewer |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@whedon start review |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
OK, I've started the review over in #1157. Feel free to close this issue now! |
whedon commentedDec 22, 2018
•
edited
Submitting author: @justinalsing (Justin Alsing)
Repository: https://github.com/justinalsing/dlmmc
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: @danielskatz
Reviewers: @Chilipp, @taqtiqa-mark
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @justinalsing. The JOSS editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.
@justinalsing if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type: