Awesome, thanks @katjamatic <https://github.com/katjamatic>! Have now added the above content here <https://github.com/OpenScienceMOOC/Module-1-Open-Principles/blob/master/content_development/MAIN.md#cultures>. You can also directly edit that file if you find it easier too :) — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#13 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ArdwT6P9qBw2GYRT33wnUjFj5vIgHg6fks5u4iAjgaJpZM4ZNoXc> .

@katjamatic <https://github.com/katjamatic> did you have a chance to add in this final paragraph yet? No worries if not! — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#13 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ArdwT5Nkx9V01iudWhAhk98_YSZlssJ_ks5vB0cjgaJpZM4ZNoXc> .

oups, sorry, I guess it would be better to move the pic a bit further below under "....However, the origins can probably go back even further to the very birth of scholarly practices. Much of what we know about our world and universe has foundations in fundamental openness, from evolution and the origin of species, through to gravity and the origins of stars.", and then add it to the following paragraph, which I cannot add directly at the moment since i am on my mobile... Am Do., 10. Jan. 2019 um 14:59 Uhr schrieb Jon Tennant < ***@***.***>: > @katjamatic <https://github.com/katjamatic> did you have a chance to add > in this final paragraph yet? No worries if not! > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#13 (comment)>, > or mute the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ArdwT5Nkx9V01iudWhAhk98_YSZlssJ_ks5vB0cjgaJpZM4ZNoXc> > . >

The technical foundations for Open Science were growing out of the international e-science, e-research, or development of distributed learning and knowledge production scene (REF). Historically this started with the development of time sharing and distributed computing (REF). The free and open software movement is also closely related to developments of Open Science (REF). On the other hand the concept of "knowledge commons" - collectively created and owned knowledge managed by a community - is traced back by Hess and Ostrom (REF) both to the idea of the "Intangible commons of the mind" (REF), which opposes increasing privatization of knowledge, and to the idea of shared spaces for free speech and democratic collective action (REF). ---- already now could come the text about Robert Merton -------- which could be contrasted with Ziman (2000)'s critique of "post-academic" science. ----- Ziman (2000) constates a shift away from Merton's norms. Due to increased economic interests, optimization of industrial research procedures, overbureaucratization, we nowadays find an ethos that is more linked to the following aspects: Post-Academic Science: Ziman 2000 •P proprietarian ( IP, business opportunity) •L local: related to local network of stakeholders •A authoritarian: hierarchical control •C commissioned (researcher is ’consultant’) •E expert: role is problem-solver Ziman states that “science is becoming a too large and expensive enterprise. Governments are putting strict financial ceilings on their patronage and are trying to get better value for their money”. In this context, researchers are required to be more accountable, responsive to societal need and concerned with the impact of their product in economic and social terms." (REF) -------Then continue with just briefly saying something like this:----- However, the communal aspect of knowledge production in science and research has been inspired by many other open cultures of collaboration and sharing, such as open government data, and cultural heritage just to name a few. Open Cultures have developed in the last decades often in parallel but also overlapping. Open Science is thus embedded firmly in a manifold open movement.... Am Fr., 11. Jan. 2019 um 15:50 Uhr schrieb Katja Mayer ***@***.*** >: > oups, sorry, > I guess it would be better to move the pic a bit further below under "....However, > the origins can probably go back even further to the very birth of > scholarly practices. Much of what we know about our world and universe has > foundations in fundamental openness, from evolution and the origin of > species, through to gravity and the origins of stars.", and then add it > to the following paragraph, which I cannot add directly at the moment since > i am on my mobile... > > > > Am Do., 10. Jan. 2019 um 14:59 Uhr schrieb Jon Tennant < > ***@***.***>: > >> @katjamatic <https://github.com/katjamatic> did you have a chance to >> add in this final paragraph yet? No worries if not! >> >> — >> You are receiving this because you were mentioned. >> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub >> <#13 (comment)>, >> or mute the thread >> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ArdwT5Nkx9V01iudWhAhk98_YSZlssJ_ks5vB0cjgaJpZM4ZNoXc> >> . >> >

Hi @katjamatic <https://github.com/katjamatic>, just bumping this again to keep on your radar in case it fell off :) — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#13 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ArdwT0NBWLER72PPrKX9B-mnU_NxjN-5ks5vF0IDgaJpZM4ZNoXc> .