Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Vertical align fix #2256

Merged
merged 6 commits into from Oct 1, 2016

Conversation

Projects
None yet
3 participants
@adam3smith
Copy link
Member

adam3smith commented Oct 1, 2016

using
perl -0777 -i -p -e 's/(layout.*)(>\n\s*)<text variable=\"citation-number\" vertical-align=\"sup\"/$1 vertical-align=\"sup\"$2<text variable=\"citation-number\"/' ./*.csl
then manually correcting for the too permissive regex.
(and no, I don't really know how to perl...)

adam3smith added some commits Oct 1, 2016

Correct vertical-align
using `perl -0777 -i -p -e 's/(layout.*)(>\n\s*)<text
variable=\"citation-number\" vertical-align=\"sup\"/$1 vertical-align=\"sup\"$2<text variable=\"citation-number\"/' ./*.csl`
(and no, I don't really know how to perl...)
@csl-bot

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

csl-bot commented Oct 1, 2016

Awesome! You've created a pull request to the Citation Styles Language styles repository. We'll get in touch soon (usually within a day or two). In the meantime, our automated test system will go ahead and run some checks on your pull request. In a few minutes you'll be notified of the test results.

If you haven't done so yet, please make sure your style validates and follows all our other Style Requirements.

To update the current pull request, visit the "Files changed" tab above, and click on the pencil icon (see below) in the top-right corner of your style to start editing.

image

If you need assistance at any point, please leave a comment and we'll get back to you (feel free to write in Dutch, English, French, German, Portuguese, or Spanish).

@csl-bot

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

csl-bot commented Oct 1, 2016

😟 There are some issues with your submission. Please check the test report for details.

@csl-bot

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

csl-bot commented Oct 1, 2016

😃 Your submission passed all our automated tests.

@adam3smith

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member Author

adam3smith commented Oct 1, 2016

@rmzelle -- I think this is ready, but leaving for you to merge for 2nd set of eyes.

@rmzelle

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

rmzelle commented Oct 1, 2016

You'd probably want to revert

american-institute-of-aeronautics-and-astronautics.csl
american-institute-of-physics.csl
international-journal-of-sports-medicine.csl
pediatric-anesthesia.csl
revista-virtual-de-quimica.csl

(all have changes in the bibliography)

@rmzelle

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

rmzelle commented Oct 1, 2016

And with my own jEdit find-regex of ^.*variable="citation-number".*vertical-align="sup"(.*\n)*.*</citation> I found 47 styles with vertical-align="sup" following variable="citation-number". in the citation section (https://forums.zotero.org/discussion/comment/262999/#Comment_262999). There don't seem to be any cases of elements with vertical-align="sup" preceding variable="citation-number".

Five more reverts
@rmzelle -- down to 47 now, should be all correct now
@csl-bot

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

csl-bot commented Oct 1, 2016

😃 Your submission passed all our automated tests.

@rmzelle rmzelle merged commit 69cd543 into citation-style-language:master Oct 1, 2016

1 check passed

continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
@rmzelle

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

rmzelle commented Oct 1, 2016

Thanks :)

@rmzelle

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

rmzelle commented Oct 1, 2016

(I'm surprised we didn't get more complaints about this, by the way, seeing how common this pattern was)

@adam3smith

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member Author

adam3smith commented Oct 1, 2016

I think these were mostly 2nd tier Elsevier journals (the mistake was introduced by one of their folks who checked styles), so not exactly our most popular styles, but yes, I would have thought we'd get a few more reports, too.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.
You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session. You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.