Awesome! You just created a pull request to the Citation Styles Language styles repository. One of our human volunteers will try to get in touch soon (usually within a week). In the meantime, I will run some automated checks. You should be notified of the results in a few minutes.

If you haven't done so yet, please make sure your style validates and follows all our other Style Requirements.

To update this pull request, visit the "Files changed" tab above, and click on the pencil icon (see below) in the top-right corner of your style to start editing.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment and we'll get back to you. While we usually respond in English, feel free to write in whatever language you're most comfortable.

😟 There are some issues with your submission. Please check the test report for details.

😟 There are some issues with your submission. Please check the test report for details.

😃 Your submission passed all our automated tests.

I'm not actually sure what to do with these requirements: This is, conceptually, an endnote style:

Each reference number should appear ONLY ONCE in the text. Subsequent references to the same source should have a new number and refer back to the initial reference.

Example:
12. See Jones [1] p. 32.

(and also asks for page numbers in the references) but they tell users explicitly not to use Word endnotes (because.... reasons). I think people are still going to be better of using endnotes, so would turn this into a note style.

😟 There are some issues with your submission. Please check the test report for details.

😃 Your submission passed all our automated tests.

@POBrien333 have a look and see what you think. I don't think we can do this style 100% either way, but this seems much closer to the spirit of it, especially with the cross-referencing.

😃 Your submission passed all our automated tests.

@POBrien333 I'd be curious about your opinion on this -- not sure this is the right way to go.

Looks good and makes sense. I hadn't seen how the bibliography was structured.
Good to go :)

Thanks!