Awesome! You just created a pull request to the Citation Styles Language styles repository. One of our human volunteers will try to get in touch soon (usually within a week). In the meantime, I will run some automated checks. You should be notified of the results in a few minutes.

If you haven't done so yet, please make sure your style validates and follows all our other Style Requirements.

To update this pull request, visit the "Files changed" tab above, and click on the pencil icon (see below) in the top-right corner of your style to start editing.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment and we'll get back to you. While we usually respond in English, feel free to write in whatever language you're most comfortable.

😃 Your submission passed all our automated tests.

It's a little trickier than this: Chicago Manual wants the full date, including year, repeated in the 17th edition. This used to be just month and day in the 16th edition.

E.g.
Google. 2016. “Privacy Policy.” Privacy & Terms. Last modified March 25, 2016. http://www.google.com/policies/privacy/.

(This has "last modified" but the rule extends generally). Since we can't actually test for the presence of day/month, I'm not sure how to get this right across the board.

Oh, okay, so the style is correct then, but just weird when there is no author or non-year date parts.

I think the ability to test for date parts comes up frequently enough to consider that for the next "big" CSL release. Should be easy enough, I imagine.

I agree. That would be helpful in a variety of ways.