Awesome! You just created a pull request to the Citation Styles Language styles repository. One of our human volunteers will try to get in touch soon (usually within a week). In the meantime, I will run some automated checks. You should be notified of the results in a few minutes.

If you haven't done so yet, please make sure your style validates and follows all our other Style Requirements.

To update this pull request, visit the "Files changed" tab above, and click on the pencil icon (see below) in the top-right corner of your style to start editing.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment and we'll get back to you. While we usually respond in English, feel free to write in whatever language you're most comfortable.

😃 Your submission passed all our automated tests.

What guide exactly is this based on? "ISO 690" is such a vague reference -- providing more general guidance than a specific citation format -- that I'd like to prevent the proliferation of styles. E.g., "Viewed" vs. "Accessed" certainly isn't something that the ISO standard specifies, is it?

ISO 690:2010. My library school wrote a guide about this style https://www.hesge.ch/heg/infotheque/citations-et-references-bibliographiques.

Great, thanks -- since this is only "based on" ISO 690:2010, I think we'll want to name this after the school rather than ISO 690. Looking briefly at the guide, I think it also makes sense to remove the note and archive macro and the block display?

Sorry but I'm not sure I understand. It's better if I change the name ? And I add the School library name?
Is it neccessary to remove the note and archive macro and the block display ? :)

It's better if we keep the name iso-690 because many schools use this standard. Et we have respected this standard. It's really specified "viewed" and not "accessed". How should I proceed to have the style validated? Sorry, this is the first time I'm correcting a style.. ;)

😃 Your submission passed all our automated tests.

I renamed the style to what we'd typically do in these cases. We could add back the "author-date" descriptor if your institution uses more than one type of ISO 690 style (like the "numeric" or "note" versions). The style is currently fixed to US English, so I added the language to the title as well (it might be possible to support both a French and an English version of the style with a single style file).

Thank you @rmzelle

😟 There are some issues with your submission. Please check the test report for details.

😃 Your submission passed all our automated tests.

@rmzelle Now, my style is submitted ?
How to display my style on www.zotero.org/styles?

@adam3smith Hi ! How to display my style on www.zotero.org/styles?

😟 There are some issues with your submission. Please check the test report for details.

😃 Your submission passed all our automated tests.

Thanks!

Thank you!!! :D