Skip to content

/warclight

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[js] Upgrade eslint to version 6.0.0 #75

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 23, 2019
+1 −1

Conversation

Reviewers

@ruebot ruebot

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
depfu
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
2 participants
@codecov-io @ruebot
@depfu
Copy link
Contributor

commented Jun 23, 2019

Here is everything you need to know about this upgrade. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.

What changed?

✳️ eslint (^5.10.0 → ^6.0.0) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

6.0.0

  • 81aa06b Upgrade: espree@6.0.0 (#11869) (Teddy Katz)
  • 5f022bc Fix: no-else-return autofix produces name collisions (fixes #11069) (#11867) (Milos Djermanovic)
  • ded9548 Fix: multiline-comment-style incorrect message (#11864) (golopot)
  • cad074d Docs: Add JSHint W047 compat to no-floating-decimal (#11861) (Timo Tijhof)
  • 41f6304 Upgrade: sinon (#11855) (Toru Nagashima)
  • 167ce87 Chore: remove unuseable profile command (#11854) (Toru Nagashima)
  • c844c6f Fix: max-len properly ignore trailing comments (fixes #11838) (#11841) (ZYSzys)
  • 1b5661a Fix: no-var should not fix variables named 'let' (fixes #11830) (#11832) (Milos Djermanovic)
  • 4d75956 Build: CI with Azure Pipelines (#11845) (Toru Nagashima)
  • 1db3462 Chore: rm superfluous argument & fix perf-multifiles-targets (#11834) (薛定谔的猫)
  • c57a4a4 Upgrade: @babel/polyfill => core-js v3 (#11833) (薛定谔的猫)
  • 65faa04 Docs: Clarify prefer-destructuring array/object difference (fixes #9970) (#11851) (Oliver Sieweke)
  • 81c3823 Fix: require-atomic-updates reports parameters (fixes #11723) (#11774) (Toru Nagashima)
  • aef8ea1 Sponsors: Sync README with website (ESLint Jenkins)

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.

Depfu Status

Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.

All Depfu comment commands
@​depfu rebase
Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update
@​depfu merge
Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved
@​depfu close
Closes this PR and deletes the branch
@​depfu reopen
Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)
@​depfu pause
Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu pause [minor|major]
Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu resume
Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)
@depfu
Update eslint to version 6.0.0
Loading status checks…
955fd1a

@depfu depfu bot added the depfu label Jun 23, 2019

@codecov-io

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
Copy link

commented Jun 23, 2019 •
edited

Codecov Report

Merging #75 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##           master    #75   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage     100%   100%           
=====================================
  Files           5      5           
  Lines          34     34           
=====================================
  Hits           34     34

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3ebed46...955fd1a. Read the comment docs.
@ruebot

ruebot approved these changes Jun 23, 2019
View changes

@ruebot ruebot merged commit 499725f into master Jun 23, 2019
3 checks passed

3 checks passed

codecov/patch Coverage not affected when comparing 3ebed46...955fd1a
Details
codecov/project 100% remains the same compared to 3ebed46
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details

@depfu depfu bot deleted the depfu/update/npm/eslint-6.0.0 branch Jun 23, 2019

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.