Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 36 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upUF40260X are simazine not desethylterbutylazine #73
Comments
meier-rene
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 4, 2019
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Solved in 47ddc42. Thanks! |
meier-rene
closed this
Jun 4, 2019
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Should we add a comment re historical identity (COMMENT: This spectrum was originally uploaded as xxx and corrected to yyy upon expert review)? And modify the date entry to show when this was updated? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
schymane commentedMay 20, 2019
UF402601, UF402602, UF402603 and UF402604 are simazine and not desethylterbutylazine, the SPLASHes are identical with the simazine spectra and Martin Krauss has confirmed the retention times also match simazine and not desethylterbutylazine. All (simazine and desethylterbutylazine) spectra were flagged as simazine by Herbert Oberacher.
https://massbank.eu/MassBank/RecordDisplay.jsp?id=UF402603
@meier-rene can you update the compound information (CH$ fields) of the UF40260X records with the compound information from here:
https://massbank.eu/MassBank/RecordDisplay.jsp?id=UF404103
Pls let me know if you need more information, or if you want me to do the updates instead, thanks!