Awesome! You've created a pull request to the Citation Styles Language locales repository. We'll get in touch soon (usually within a day or two). In the meantime, our automated test system will go ahead and run some checks on your pull request. In a few minutes you'll be notified of the test results.

If you haven't done so yet, please make sure your locale file validates.

To update the current pull request, visit the "Files changed" tab above, and click on the pencil icon (see below) in the top-right corner of your locale file to start editing.

If you need assistance at any point, please leave a comment and we'll get back to you (feel free to write in Dutch, English, French, German, Portuguese, or Spanish).

Uh-oh! Looks like there are (still) some issues with your submission. Please check the latest test report for details.

Yay! Your pull request passed all our automated tests. We'll take a look soon.

@embar-, @aurimasv, can you review this? I took @aurimasv's version, and then removed anything that wasn't valid CSL 1.0.1 (per http://docs.citationstyles.org/en/stable/specification.html#gender-specific-ordinals, it's only allowed to specify a gender for the long form of CSL number variable terms and months terms).

Apart from the gender assignments, the ordinal terms are changed, and a translator for "illustrator".

Gender definitions are good. But as said in #153 (comment) and in #153 (comment) , we don't need genders for dates; if it will be used, then gender of day (as digit) depends on word "diena" (eng. "day", feminine), not on month (mixed genders).

We should keep "ordinal-03" and "ordinal-13" definitions in 78-79 lines.
At 275 line we should keep "iliustr."; see foe example http://internet.unib.ktu.lt/chemija_lt/suda_lite.htm

We could also add
<term name="ordinal-03" gender-form="masculine">-iasis</term>
<term name="ordinal-13" gender-form="masculine">-asis</term>
<term name="ordinal-03" gender-form="feminine">-ioji</term>
<term name="ordinal-13" gender-form="feminine">-oji</term>

Yay! Your pull request passed all our automated tests. We'll take a look soon.

How about now?

Thanks, this is very good!

Great. I'll merge this once I get the okay from @aurimasv as well. (Sorry if I was a bit slow in catching up; I don't know anything about Lithuanian)

I removed the genders from the month terms, since it would just lead to confusion, because CSL currently assumes that the day number in ordinal form follows the gender of the month, which you indicated is not the case for Lithuanian. We could assign the "feminine" gender to all "month" terms to hack around this (since "diena" is feminine), but that's also confusing, so I rather leave things as they are. If anybody really would like proper support, we should amend the CSL specification instead.