Awesome! You just created a pull request to the Citation Styles Language styles repository. One of our human volunteers will try to get in touch soon (usually within a week). In the meantime, I will run some automated checks. You should be notified of the results in a few minutes.

If you haven't done so yet, please make sure your style validates and follows all our other Style Requirements.

To update this pull request, visit the "Files changed" tab above, and click on the pencil icon (see below) in the top-right corner of your style to start editing.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment and we'll get back to you. While we usually respond in English, feel free to write in whatever language you're most comfortable.

😃 Your submission passed all our automated tests.

Thanks for describing these styles on your github. Could you say a bit more about who would be using these styles and for what?

These styles are made priorily for researchers and documentalists of "service Patrimoine et Inventaire" of région Centre-Val de Loire (France). But they will be useful for all researchers of all heritage inventory services of country (1 per region). General inventory use bibliography norms derived from ISO-690 norms but with some modifications.

So these styles are adapted of uses of general inventory and will allow agents use Zotero and ZoteroBib in to collect, organize and cite their references avoiding all error.

@adam3smith Do you wish I add this on my github ?

I'm trying to ascertain whether this is a good fit for the repository. Here are our criteria:
https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/wiki/Criteria-for-Accepting-Styles

To me, this sounds a bit like it's falling under the first category of style we do not accept (but I'm open to be convinced that I'm misunderstanding)

OK, that makes sense then for us and yes, we'd absolutely want a general name that reflects this:

The document joined in my GitHub is the style guide edited by the mission of general heritage inventory of french culture ministry.

You can put the provenance info in the summary field if you wish.

And just to confirm, all three styles are actually in use?

Ok, I'll rename the styles. The prescriptions of ministry doesn't have any name, so I think the better way is using a title designating directly the general inventory of cultural heritage. It should be clearer and I'll use the summary field to precise the provenance of styles.

If you are agree with that, I'll correct styles in the coming days.

And in our service, 'spi note', 'spi full note' and 'spi full note with ibid' are used depending on the restitution support of our research. However, we never use the last 'author date' style. I don't know if others researchers in the other services use it.

The prescriptions of ministry doesn't have any name, so I think the better way is using a title designating directly the general inventory of cultural heritage.

Yes, that sounds good.

😃 Your submission passed all our automated tests.

So, I renamed all styles. It should be good now. Hope I didn't make any mistake.