Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 40 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign up[REVIEW]: cppduals: a nestable vectorized templated dual number library for C++11 #1487
Comments
whedon
assigned
danielskatz
Jun 5, 2019
whedon
added
the
review
label
Jun 5, 2019
whedon
referenced this issue
Jun 5, 2019
Closed
[PRE REVIEW]: cppduals: a nestable vectorized templated dual number library for C++11 #1446
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. @StewMH and @mdavezac, it looks like you're currently assigned as the reviewers for this paper If you haven't already, you should seriously consider unsubscribing from GitHub notifications for this (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews) repository. As a reviewer, you're probably currently watching this repository which means for GitHub's default behaviour you will receive notifications (emails) for all reviews To fix this do the following two things:
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
danielskatz
commented
Jun 5, 2019
If you have any questions or problems, please tell me. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Hi @tesch1, I tried compiling this with GCC 7.3 and got this error:
I think you need a workaround here. See e.g. opencv/opencv#8080 for a similar issue. I didn't have any luck compiling it with Clang on Ubuntu either, so far. Also, it's Apache-licensed but you have MPL-licensed files: |
whedon
assigned
mdavezac and
StewMH
Jun 6, 2019
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
tesch1
commented
Jun 6, 2019
Hi, Thanks for reviewing! Ah yeah, the "older gcc missing avx primitive". Just checked in an update/workaround. Does it compile for you now? Also, did you run into the same error(s) under clang, or was there something else? Regarding the licenses, yes, there are some files that were modified from Eigen, so retain the Eigen license. These are only included with |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@tesch1, have you considered dual licensing the non-eigen parts with MPL as well as Apache? That way, users can pick a format where the whole product is covered under a single license. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
tesch1
commented
Jun 6, 2019
Oh yes, that's a great idea. I'll do that. I picked Apache+LLVM because libc++ uses it, and wanted to be broadly compatible with that, but dual-licensing is even better. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
danielskatz
commented
Jun 10, 2019
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Hi, I have got past the missing avx primitive with GCC. Now the compilation runs for a while but fails with an ICE probably related to out-of-memory, at least on my VM. I can try a more powerful bare-metal machine, the VM only has 2G of RAM. Cheers, |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
An issue has been filed in the original repo. @StewMH, I think I clicked on your checkboxes rather than mine at some point... I tried to undo the damage, but I do apologized if I made a mess of things |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
danielskatz
commented
Jun 13, 2019
@tesch1 - please let us know when you have worked on the issues in https://gitlab.com/tesch1/cppduals/issues/4 |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
tesch1
commented
Jun 15, 2019
Thanks for the great comments. I'm currently on the road without a
computer for a couple weeks, and will let you know when the questions have
been addressed.
…On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 12:10 PM Daniel S. Katz ***@***.***> wrote:
@tesch1 <https://github.com/tesch1> - please let us know when you have
worked on the issues in https://gitlab.com/tesch1/cppduals/issues/4
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1487?email_source=notifications&email_token=AACOYL5FL5AK7UHHXBIPDA3P2J5OPA5CNFSM4HTUNXL2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODXUMLGA#issuecomment-501794200>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACOYLY4YXGMRU6GAGHUJ63P2J5OPANCNFSM4HTUNXLQ>
.
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
danielskatz
commented
Jun 17, 2019
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Reminder set for @tesch1 in 2 weeks |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
danielskatz
commented
Jul 7, 2019
|
2 similar comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
danielskatz
commented
Jul 12, 2019
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
danielskatz
commented
Jul 19, 2019
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
tesch1
commented
Jul 19, 2019
@whedon generate pdf from branch paper-3 @StewMH - did you ever get it to compile? Some Eigen constructs can be quite demanding on compiler memory, especially in newer (> 3.3.7) versions. I've updated https://gitlab.com/tesch1/cppduals/issues/4 and merged changes into the master branch (which is currently building). Regarding licensing, have changed everything to MPL-2 for simplicity's sake. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
tesch1
commented
Jul 19, 2019
@danielskatz It would appear that whedon does not correctly use custom branches from gitlab when generating pdfs (or I did the syntax wrong above?) |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
danielskatz
commented
Jul 19, 2019
What didn't work? It looks like whedon generated a PDF. Is it not from the right branch? |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
tesch1
commented
Jul 19, 2019
It is not from the right branch. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
danielskatz
commented
Jul 19, 2019
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
What branch were you expecting changes from? |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@whedon generate pdf from branch paper-3 |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
tesch1
commented
Jul 19, 2019
so... it works when you do it, or it was queued up somewhere and didn't complete / wasn't available until sometime after whedon posted 'Check article proof' I'm quite certain that the link above (after I sent the whedon command) had the wrong version. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
danielskatz
commented
Jul 19, 2019
every once in a while, my safari seems to get confused and delivers a cached version... |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
danielskatz
commented
Jul 19, 2019
but glad it's ok now. Can you let us know where you think things are in terms of addressing comments from the reviewers? |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
tesch1
commented
Jul 19, 2019
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
danielskatz
commented
Jul 26, 2019
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
tesch1
commented
Jul 26, 2019
Yes, I believe I have addressed all the review items listed in the linked
"issue" above. The bullet points correspond to the checklist. Maybe that
wasn't clear from my previous message.
…On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 11:56 AM Daniel S. Katz ***@***.***> wrote:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
danielskatz
commented
Jul 26, 2019
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
danielskatz
commented
Aug 2, 2019
1 similar comment
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
danielskatz
commented
Aug 9, 2019
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Sorry, let me address this today |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Hi @tesch1 How do I build and test the package? It's a while since I looked at this, and I'm now getting some weird errors if I try to build the tests:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
tesch1
commented
Aug 9, 2019
•
Hi @StewMH - the tests directory is a dependent subdirectory of the base - so you need
Disclosure: I cant test this at the moment, because I just got a new machine and the latest Apple clang is crashing on building the tests, but it should work. Gah. Edit: ON not OFF |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
OK, on Red Hat I have this issue:
But I do have a BLAS:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
tesch1
commented
Aug 9, 2019
Do you have openblas-devel installed, or can you install it?
…On Friday, August 9, 2019, Stewart Martin-Haugh ***@***.***> wrote:
OK, on Red Hat I have this issue:
-- Looking for sgemm_
-- Looking for sgemm_ - not found
CMake Error at /cvmfs/atlas.cern.ch/repo/ATLASLocalRootBase/x86_64/Cmake/3.14.3/Linux-x86_64/share/cmake-3.14/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:137 (message):
Could NOT find BLAS (missing: BLAS_LIBRARIES)
Call Stack (most recent call first):
/cvmfs/atlas.cern.ch/repo/ATLASLocalRootBase/x86_64/Cmake/3.14.3/Linux-x86_64/share/cmake-3.14/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:378 (_FPHSA_FAILURE_MESSAGE)
/cvmfs/atlas.cern.ch/repo/ATLASLocalRootBase/x86_64/Cmake/3.14.3/Linux-x86_64/share/cmake-3.14/Modules/FindBLAS.cmake:766 (find_package_handle_standard_args)
tests/CMakeLists.txt:98 (find_package)
But I do have a BLAS:
/usr/lib/libblas.so
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1487?email_source=notifications&email_token=AACOYL4M7GLNCZRRK2QPEVDQDWJZPA5CNFSM4HTUNXL2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD37DXZA#issuecomment-519977956>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACOYLZKJNHL4IXSD5GWRGTQDWJZPANCNFSM4HTUNXLQ>
.
|
whedon commentedJun 5, 2019
•
edited by mdavezac
Submitting author: @tesch1 (Michael Tesch)
Repository: https://gitlab.com/tesch1/cppduals
Version: v0.1.0
Editor: @danielskatz
Reviewer: @StewMH, @mdavezac
Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@StewMH & @mdavezac, please carry out your review in this issue by updating the checklist below. If you cannot edit the checklist please:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @danielskatz know.
Review checklist for @StewMH
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
paper.md
file include a list of authors with their affiliations?Review checklist for @mdavezac
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
paper.md
file include a list of authors with their affiliations?