Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 40 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upUpdate record format #203
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
I received an email earlier today with additional field suggestions. They want to add precursor intensity and concentration of the chemical. Do you want to hold off with revising until they have replied? For the record I suggested AC$CONCENTRATION and MS$FOCUSED_ION: PRECURSOR_INT. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
In meanwhile some comments came in... |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@schymane, do you know when they will details on their invention? I would like to release 2.4 soon to get it from the table and to start the work with implementation. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
They wanted concentration information and precursor intensity in the records and my suggestions would be to add new tags: I don't know if we have to wait for more details - if you want to slightly modify my suggestions let's discuss ... I have not had a response...and think we should finalise ... |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Well, I will put it in with any description and then finalise 2.4. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
I think AC$CONCENTRATION does not really fit to any of the existing analytical sections. I will create a new general section for comment tags... |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Would "AC$CHROMATOGRAPHY CONCENTRATION" fit? |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
I toyed with a few ideas and kept landing on AC$CONCENTRATION We do not always have chromatography (direct infusion?) |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
I added the AC$GENERAL section 2.4.7 for such purposes. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Hm. In all publications with analytical chemistry I totally support reporting concentrations. |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
The email contact wanted indeed to use this data to predict ionisation efficiency based on information such as concentration and precursor intensity. All other info needed is already available (if provided) in the record format. I understand the unwillingness to add too much detail and these should certainly not be compulsory fields, however this is information that people may have. I am not sure how many people will actually add this information and I would be hesitant to add it to RMB esp with our lack of active programmers on it right now, but I see no harm to add it to the record format to standardize it if people wish to add it (otherwise it will e.g. end up in the COMMENT field...)? |
tsufz commentedOct 29, 2019
Updata records format and bump to version 2.4.