@majensen - more that Whedon can do already? (e.g. openjournals/joss-reviews#1796 (comment))

Ooh maybe I and @briatte need a pro tip about that...?

I think we got it at openjournals/joss-reviews#1796 (comment)

So Whedon checks DOIs when editors prepare the final proof of a paper with @whedon accept but it might need to be better documented :-)

You can ask Whedon to check references at any time with @whedon check references (docs).

It's documented as an editor step after reviewers recommend acceptance - see https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/editing.html#after-reviewers-recommend-acceptance

@majensen - Can we close this issue?

It's documented as an editor step after reviewers recommend acceptance - see https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/editing.html#after-reviewers-recommend-acceptance

It often is the case that reviewers will mention missing DOIs in their reviews. Perhaps a DOI check could be done to manuscripts before the reviewing starts?

It often is the case that reviewers will mention missing DOIs in their reviews. Perhaps a DOI check could be done to manuscripts before the reviewing starts?

That's a good idea. We can do this at the start of the review process.

Added in openjournals/whedon-api@fb45519