Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 40 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign up[REVIEW]: FAT Forensics: A Python Toolbox for Implementing and Deploying Fairness, Accountability and Transparency Algorithms in Predictive Systems #1904
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. @bernease, @ @osolari it looks like you're currently assigned to review this paper If you haven't already, you should seriously consider unsubscribing from GitHub notifications for this (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews) repository. As a reviewer, you're probably currently watching this repository which means for GitHub's default behaviour you will receive notifications (emails) for all reviews To fix this do the following two things:
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
PDF failed to compile for issue #1904 with the following error: pandoc-citeproc: reference osolari not found Looks like we failed to compile the PDF |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@whedon generate pdf |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
PDF failed to compile for issue #1904 with the following error: pandoc-citeproc: reference osolari not found Looks like we failed to compile the PDF |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
whedon commentedNov 20, 2019
Submitting author: @So-Cool (Kacper Sokol)
Repository: https://github.com/fat-forensics/fat-forensics
Version: 0.0.1
Editor: @arokem
Reviewer: @bernease, @ @osolari
Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@bernease & @ @osolari, please carry out your review in this issue by updating the checklist below. If you cannot edit the checklist please:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @arokem know.
Review checklist for @bernease
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
Review checklist for @ @osolari
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper