Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 40 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign up[REVIEW]: FAT Forensics: A Python Toolbox for Implementing and Deploying Fairness, Accountability and Transparency Algorithms in Predictive Systems #1904
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. @bernease, @ @osolari it looks like you're currently assigned to review this paper If you haven't already, you should seriously consider unsubscribing from GitHub notifications for this (https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews) repository. As a reviewer, you're probably currently watching this repository which means for GitHub's default behaviour you will receive notifications (emails) for all reviews To fix this do the following two things:
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
PDF failed to compile for issue #1904 with the following error: pandoc-citeproc: reference osolari not found Looks like we failed to compile the PDF |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@whedon generate pdf |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
PDF failed to compile for issue #1904 with the following error: pandoc-citeproc: reference osolari not found Looks like we failed to compile the PDF |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@whedon generate pdf |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Very weird. I'm not sure what's going on here. I've manually fixed up the review issue at the top. Also, the compilation error is related to the extra |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Thanks @arfon |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
|
whedon commentedNov 20, 2019
•
edited by bernease
Submitting author: @So-Cool (Kacper Sokol)
Repository: https://github.com/fat-forensics/fat-forensics
Version: 0.0.1
Editor: @arokem
Reviewer: @bernease, @osolari
Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@bernease & @osolari, please carry out your review in this issue by updating the checklist below. If you cannot edit the checklist please:
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @arokem know.
Review checklist for @bernease
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper
Review checklist for @osolari
Conflict of interest
Code of Conduct
General checks
Functionality
Documentation
Software paper