Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

What happens now?

This submission is currently in a pre-review state which means we are waiting for an editor to be assigned and for them to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience 😸

You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.

Attempting to check references...

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

👋 @kthyng - the submitting author suggested you as the handling editor.

PDF failed to compile for issue #1965 with the following error:

Can't find any papers to compile :-(

@whedon commands

Here are some things you can ask me to do:

# List Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands

# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors

# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers

EDITORIAL TASKS

# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf

# Compile the paper from alternative branch
@whedon generate pdf from branch custom-branch-name

# Ask Whedon to check the references for missing DOIs
@whedon check references

@whedon generate pdf from branch joss-paper

Attempting PDF compilation from custom branch joss-paper. Reticulating splines etc...

👉 Check article proof 📄 👈

OK DOIs

- 10.1029/96JC02775 is OK
- 10/f9wkpj is OK
- 10.1109/TPDS.2018.2872064 is OK
- 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 is OK
- 10.5670/oceanog.2016.66 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

@kthyng — We're hoping you can handle this submission. I will follow up with an email now.

👋 Hey @labarba...

Letting you know, @kthyng is currently OOO until Tuesday, January 7th 2020. ❤️

@ali-ramadhan — As you can expect, a lot of our editors and reviewers are on holiday these days. I hereby request your patience, as the closest editor to the domain of your submission is unavailable until January 7th.

Hi @labarba thank you for checking in!

Of course that's totally expected. Just wanted to submit this before the holidays. Resuming in January sounds good!

@whedon assign @kthyng as editor

👋 Hey @kthyng...

Letting you know, @kthyng is currently OOO until Tuesday, January 7th 2020. ❤️

OK, the editor is @kthyng

👋 Hey @whedon...

Letting you know, @kthyng is currently OOO until Tuesday, January 7th 2020. ❤️

I'm happy to be editor, though I would appreciate waiting on this until January as already mentioned. It'll be hard to get reviewers now too. I'll set a reminder

@whedon remind @kthyng in 18 days

👋 Hey @kthyng...

Letting you know, @kthyng is currently OOO until Tuesday, January 7th 2020. ❤️

Sorry, I can't set reminders on PRE-REVIEW issues.

Oh yeah, I think this is an active issue. Ok well I will just be back in a few weeks. Happy holidays!!

@whedon generate pdf from branch joss-paper

Attempting PDF compilation from custom branch joss-paper. Reticulating splines etc...

👉 Check article proof 📄 👈

@kthyng Thank you for agreeing to review our submission as editor!

It seems that our submission was already assigned a DOI (10.21105/joss.01965) so I was curious whether it would be safe to use the following citation in another manuscript that wishes to cite this JOSS submission, or if you would refrain from any citations during the review process.

@article{OceananigansJOSS,
  title     = {Oceananigans.jl: {Fast} and friendly geophysical fluid dynamics on GPUs},
  author    = {Ali Ramadhan and Gregory LeClaire Wagner and Chris Hill and Jean-Michel Campin and Valentin Churavy and Tim Besard and Andre Souza and Alan Edelman and John Marshall and Raffaele Ferrari},
  journal   = {The Journal of Open Source Software},
  publisher = {The Open Journal},
  volume    = {4},
  number    = {44},
  pages     = {1965},
  year      = {2020},
  doi       = {10.21105/joss.01965},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01965},
  note      = {Under review.}
}

@openjournals/joss-eics Is it ok to start using the joss-assigned DOI for an incoming submission while it is under review? (pre-review currently actually)

@funsim and @rsignell-usgs Are you interested and willing to review this submission to the Journal for Open Source Software? We ask for reviews within about 3 weeks, and you can learn more about the review process here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

Is it ok to start using the joss-assigned DOI for an incoming submission while it is under review? (pre-review currently actually)

It's not really up to us. Using it is possible, but it won't resolve until the submission is accepted, so it will look odd to anyone trying it. I personally would instead call this an "under review" submission and not use the URL until it is accepted.

Thank you for the clarification @danielskatz, we'll do that.