Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

What happens now?

This submission is currently in a pre-review state which means we are waiting for an editor to be assigned and for them to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience 😸

You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.

Attempting to check references...

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

Failed to discover a valid open source license.

OK DOIs

- 10.1007/978-3-642-11674-2_15 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2019.1700482 may be missing for title: Development of emotion recognition in popular music and vocal bursts
- https://doi.org/10.1525/jpms.2018.300411 may be missing for title: Quantitative Sentiment Analysis of Lyrics in Popular Music
- https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00037 may be missing for title: tidytext: Text Mining and Analysis Using Tidy Data Principles in R.
- https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v059.i10 may be missing for title: Tidy data

INVALID DOIs

- None

👉 Check article proof 📄 👈

I'll get to adding the missing DOIs.

Potential Reviewers:
@alexhanna: R user + NLP
@faroit: is a pyton user but seems to do work in MIR

@whedon generate pdf

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

👉 Check article proof 📄 👈

Hi! I don't have the bandwidth for this right now. Looks like a cool project, though.

@whedon assign @danielskatz as editor

OK, the editor is @danielskatz

@JosiahParry - due to the holidays, this will likely take a little time to get reviewers assigned. Do you have additional suggestions for reviewers, perhaps based on people who have written other software in this field, with GitHub handles (but please don't tag them with @'s, since we don't want to add lots of people to the notifications of this thread) or email addresses or even just names?

@danielskatz @JosiahParry I could do it but I am no expert on R software and also I work mainly with audio whereas this contribution is more focussed on text metadata if I'm not mistaken.

Thanks @faroit - let me see if I can find some reviewers with closer expertise

Maybe consider @bmcfee he's also a python head but has significantly more experience with core MIR

👋 @bmcfee - would you be interested in reviewing this submission for JOSS?

Sure @danielskatz , thanks for the invitation! I'm not too much of an R user, so it might not be a bad idea to get an R person to chime in as well.

Thanks - I'll add you to the system and continue to look for another reviewer before we start the review

@whedon add @bmcfee as reviewer

OK, @bmcfee is now a reviewer

Thank you @danielskatz for figuring this all out! And thank you @bmcfee for being willing to review it :) It is very much appreciated.

Now after the holidays, I've tweeted about finding another reviewer - https://twitter.com/danielskatz/status/1214185648279572481

One more suggestions: I know @heraldoborges who is an active R user and a researcher in Machine Learning/Information Retrieval.

👋 @heraldoborges - would you be willing to review this for JOSS? (If you haven't reviewed for JOSS before, please see our intro to reviewing and review criteria)

@whedon add @heraldoborges as reviewer

OK, @heraldoborges is now a reviewer

@whedon start review

OK, I've started the review over in #1995. Feel free to close this issue now!