Skip to content
Please note that GitHub no longer supports your web browser.

We recommend upgrading to the latest Google Chrome or Firefox.

Learn more
Empowering peer reviewers in Palaeontology with a checklist to improve transparency
HTML
Branch: master
Clone or download
Cannot retrieve the latest commit at this time.
Cannot retrieve the latest commit at this time.
Permalink
Type Name Latest commit message Commit time
Failed to load latest commit information.
data Added image ideas Dec 30, 2019
images Added image ideas Dec 30, 2019
key_papers Added image ideas Dec 30, 2019
.gitignore Added Rproject, Code of Conduct and Contributing guidelines Aug 13, 2019
CONTRIBUTING.md Added Rproject, Code of Conduct and Contributing guidelines Aug 13, 2019
LICENSE.md Added Rproject, Code of Conduct and Contributing guidelines Aug 13, 2019
Peer-Review-Transparency.Rproj
README.md Updated citation Dec 30, 2019
manuscript.docx Updated to include Zenodo reference Jan 22, 2020
manuscript.html Updated to include Zenodo reference Jan 22, 2020
manuscript.md Updated to include Zenodo reference Jan 22, 2020
manuscript.pdf

README.md

title author date output
Peer Review Transparency
Jon Tennant
30 December 2019
word_document html_document pdf_document
default
default
default

Introduction

Aim: To investigate and improve the transparency of peer review in palaeontological journals.

Peer review is widely considered fundamental to maintaining the rigour and validity of scholarly research. However, the process is often opaque, which can introduce bias into reporting standards for research and reduce the overall quality of the published record.

Presently, peer review is a non-standardised process, either across or within disciplines. Training and support is generally lacking, and it is often the case that reviewers, through no fault of their own, are unaware of the critical questions to be asking with respect to research design, methods, reporting, and analysis.

Concept

The aim of this project, therefore, is to create a set of guidelines and a checklist for reviewers that can help to provide more rigour into the review process. This is specifically geared at palaeontologists, and based on studies such as that by Parker et al. (2018) and the Peer Reviewers Openness Initiative.

There is a great potential for such guidelines to become commonly adopted, to help strengthen the overall review process, while acting as an educational resource for reviewers. We anticipate that this will help to reduce bias and increase transparency, overall increasing the health of peer review in Palaeontology, and therefore become a valuable resource for the global Palaeontology community.

How to contribute

Peer Review Transparency is an open project that anyone can contribute to on GitHub. All data sources, methods, code, and results are openly shared for collaboration and inspection as the project evolves.

The main manuscript file can be found here, drafted initially in markdown.

We strongly encourage others to participate in the project, propose their own ideas, and to contribute or re-use any of the data or other information available here.

Citation

Jon Tennant. (2019, December 30). Meta-Paleo/Peer-Review-Transparency: First release (Version v1.11). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3595177

DOI

License

This work is licensed CC BY.

You can’t perform that action at this time.