Awesome! You just created a pull request to the Citation Styles Language styles repository. One of our human volunteers will try to get in touch soon (usually within a week). In the meantime, I will run some automated checks. You should be notified of the results in a few minutes.

If you haven't done so yet, please make sure your style validates and follows all our other Style Requirements.

To update this pull request, visit the "Files changed" tab above, and click on the pencil icon (see below) in the top-right corner of your style to start editing.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment and we'll get back to you. While we usually respond in English, feel free to write in whatever language you're most comfortable.

😟 There are some issues with your submission.

Please check the test report for details.

😟 There are some issues with your submission.

Please check the test report for details.

😃 Your submission passed all our automated tests.

@rmzelle @retorquere -- any ideas why we're not getting citation preview here? Also missing from #4524

Sorry... I thought it was only needed if I request a style and not create one.
Here you go:

In-text citation:
(Campbell & Pedersen, 2007)
(Mares, 2001)

Bibliography:
Campbell, J. L. & O.K. Pedersen (2007): The varieties of capitalism and hybrid success.- Comparative Political Studies 40(3): 307–332
Mares, I. (2001): Firms and the welfare state: When, why, and how does social policy matter to employers?.- In: Hall, P. A. & D. Soskice (Eds.): Varieties of capitalism. The institutional foundations of comparative advantage.- pp. 184–213, (Oxford University Press) New York

I hope this is correct.

I have found why Sheldon isn't responding, but haven't found the root cause yet.

@RobNik2020 No, that wasn't directed at you, sorry for the misunderstanding. Our automated PR checker should produce a set of citations from your proposed style once all tests pass and for some reason that's not happening here. See #4512 (comment) for an example of how this _should look.

citation-style-language/Sheldon#25

@adam3smith Okay. Thanks for clarifying. I think I have to update the csl-file because there are not yet all types considered correctly...

@RobNik2020 Yes -- it looks like you're not actually adding much in terms of bibliography at all in the current version. Let us know once you're done or if you need help.

😃 Your submission passed all our automated tests.

Below are some sample citations generated based on your proposed changes:

@RobNik2020 you can now see the preview in the last comment by the csl-bot. This will be included with every passing addition to this PR. As you can see, this is missing most of the bibligoraphy for standard item types.

Thanks. Yes I will work on it and let you know. Sorry for having it uploaded too soon. I thought with this I can go on in the visual editor from mendeley. But I cannot save new styles when there is no repository for them yet (which makes sense)...

(you can just copy over the code into the code editor on Mendeley and continue working there. FWIW, the version of the editor on editor.citationstyles.org is typically more up-to-date than the Mendeley version.)